Difference between revisions of "Talk:World government/NPOV conflict"
Mikitivity (Talk | contribs) (Very Biased) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Tnx. [[User:Knootoss|Knoot]] 22:07, 11 Oct 2004 (GMT) | Tnx. [[User:Knootoss|Knoot]] 22:07, 11 Oct 2004 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Very Biased == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This article is very biased, and is based on political theories (largely coming from an individual). Personally I feel it should be clearly connected as a role-play tool to the individuals that believe in this concept. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A clear example of why this current draft if biased is how it does not describe a "right-wing", and suggests that "left-wing" nations are seeking to influence other nations. The implication is that non-left-wing nations are not doing so. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Personally I don't see enough "neutral" material in this post to actually believe that minor edits can fix the problem here, but my suggestion is that this be relabeled / moved to be clearly viewed by new readers as being "World Government (Opinion from Neo-Liberals)", which I feel is the term being promoted here. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I also suggest that since it is not really clear what Neo-Liberal means, that the theory of what they are, also be described. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Personally I feel it is a bit of a shame, because the terms used in this article really are self-applied labels and don't fit in with the UN Categories of nation types. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'd rather the minor edit be made (i.e. moving this opinion piece) and then focusing on actually improving the NSWiki by adding entries that would actually be useful to more than players trying to sell a single style of play / world vision. | ||
Revision as of 03:10, 12 October 2004
Frisbeeteria: Hmmm. NPOV notice, but only original author footprints. Interesting. ;)
- accuses self*
Well, I'm leaving this message so the forum crowd (read: HotRodia) has a change to edit. Knoot 12:01, 8 Oct 2004 (GMT)
"...has a 'change' to edit." I think you mean "chance". Sorry, I'm just in editing mode today. :D It's that English Ed. Major in me. I made a few small grammatical and spelling changes (before I created an account), and when I have more time I'll try to do a more thorough edit for readability and neutrality. It looks good on first glance, Knoot. I approve of your changes. ~HotRodia 5:02, 11 October 2004
Tnx. Knoot 22:07, 11 Oct 2004 (GMT)
Very Biased
This article is very biased, and is based on political theories (largely coming from an individual). Personally I feel it should be clearly connected as a role-play tool to the individuals that believe in this concept.
A clear example of why this current draft if biased is how it does not describe a "right-wing", and suggests that "left-wing" nations are seeking to influence other nations. The implication is that non-left-wing nations are not doing so.
Personally I don't see enough "neutral" material in this post to actually believe that minor edits can fix the problem here, but my suggestion is that this be relabeled / moved to be clearly viewed by new readers as being "World Government (Opinion from Neo-Liberals)", which I feel is the term being promoted here.
I also suggest that since it is not really clear what Neo-Liberal means, that the theory of what they are, also be described.
Personally I feel it is a bit of a shame, because the terms used in this article really are self-applied labels and don't fit in with the UN Categories of nation types.
I'd rather the minor edit be made (i.e. moving this opinion piece) and then focusing on actually improving the NSWiki by adding entries that would actually be useful to more than players trying to sell a single style of play / world vision.
