Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Feedback"

Revision as of 16:10, 11 December 2006

I'm nominating this for deletion because, well, of course the authors want constructive feedback! It's a wiki! Anyone can march right in and improve the article. Plus, this makes articles look ugly. Ceoran_ta 02:11, 7 November 2006 (GMT)

I agree. If people want to leave feedback there's the discussion page. I don't see the point in "panhandling" for feedback with a template.--Pantocratoria 04:48, 7 November 2006 (GMT)

I don't see any harm in it. It simply means that the article's author will be specially receptive to feedback, which should encourage giving it. Keep. Aridd 14:13, 7 November 2006 (GMT)

What about moving it to talk pages then? That might actually be a better idea. It would allow authors to ask for suggestions but keep pages looking nice. A big green bar that has nothing to do with the actual article doesn't seem good. Ceoran_ta 22:26, 7 November 2006 (GMT)

Move it to talk pages and add an <includeonly> Category to categorise all the articles for easier browsing? LE (WP) | Talk 15:05, 11 December 2006 (GMT)

Agree with Aridd, as that is the intent of the feedback prefix plate in the first place. You can change the colour if you'd like, that's not really a big deal, considering that I only chose green because we were using peach for FACs, red for WIPs and light blue for featureds. (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 20:10, 11 December 2006 (GMT)