Difference between revisions of "User talk:Quebrada/Ban"
Frisbeeteria (Talk | contribs) m |
(→Comments) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Does this refer to all editing, or only of articles? ie. are discussion pages, sandbox, etc allowed. [[User:Cacobellum|[[User:Cacobellum|Cacobellvm]]|[[User talk:Cacobellum|✐<small>''talk''</small>]]]] 04:53, 22 Nov 2004 (GMT) | Does this refer to all editing, or only of articles? ie. are discussion pages, sandbox, etc allowed. [[User:Cacobellum|[[User:Cacobellum|Cacobellvm]]|[[User talk:Cacobellum|✐<small>''talk''</small>]]]] 04:53, 22 Nov 2004 (GMT) | ||
: Given the argumentative nature of the Talk pages above, and a general unwillingness from this user to listen to the wiki community and sysops, I'd say discussion pages are also under the ban. [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>''talk''</small>]] 05:20, 22 Nov 2004 (GMT) | : Given the argumentative nature of the Talk pages above, and a general unwillingness from this user to listen to the wiki community and sysops, I'd say discussion pages are also under the ban. [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>''talk''</small>]] 05:20, 22 Nov 2004 (GMT) | ||
| + | How was the ban period of 1 year decided? (As in what's the sliding scale of misdemeanours?) His misdeeds really focused around an utterly fantastical military history for a fantasy nation, an unwillingness to log on properly and goading sysops by being perpetually stupid. As utterly annoying as this obviously was, how much of it was a genuine threat or vandalism to the wiki? I'm asking not to imply an answer, just to ask. If he's real rather than just a wind-up merchant he's certainly a [[Godmod |godmoddery]] felon of the highest order. But isn't that just a link? | ||
| + | |||
| + | (Also - I use Netscape Navigator and am frequently logged out between a preview and saving. However, I don't believe Quebrada is for real - but what could be real is that a precedent for banning periods may be set which may be inappropriate in the future) [[User:Sacco and Vanzetti|Sacco and Vanzetti]] 18:49, 22 Nov 2004 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 14:49, 22 November 2004
After discussion with other users, I have taken the following actions against User:Quebrada:
- Quebrada is banned from editing NSwiki for a period of 1 year. Per Wikipedia precedents, this ban will reset any time Quebrada makes an edit. Any edits by Quebrada should be reverted on sight.
- Any IP used by Quebrada to edit NSwiki will be blocked for a period of 6 hours. Since Quebrada uses AOL, a more lengthy block is not appropriate.
- Any new accounts created by Quebrada to edit NSwiki will be blocked indefinitely.
Since I don't like taking these kind of actions unilaterally, I'm opening this page up for a discussion and referendum on my action. Feel free to add options to this quasi-poll.
Quebrada's contributions are difficult to trace, as the user often failed to log in. However, more evidence can be seen at Talk:Quebrada and Talk:Rejistania.
--Goobergunch|? 02:19, 22 Nov 2004 (GMT)
1-year ban, 6-hour IP block
- Goobergunch|? 02:19, 22 Nov 2004 (GMT)
- → Frisbeeteria Θtalk 04:32, 22 Nov 2004 (GMT) (See other arguments at User Talk:Quebrada)
No ban
Comments
Does this refer to all editing, or only of articles? ie. are discussion pages, sandbox, etc allowed. [[User:Cacobellum|Cacobellvm|✐talk]] 04:53, 22 Nov 2004 (GMT)
- Given the argumentative nature of the Talk pages above, and a general unwillingness from this user to listen to the wiki community and sysops, I'd say discussion pages are also under the ban. → Fris Θtalk 05:20, 22 Nov 2004 (GMT)
How was the ban period of 1 year decided? (As in what's the sliding scale of misdemeanours?) His misdeeds really focused around an utterly fantastical military history for a fantasy nation, an unwillingness to log on properly and goading sysops by being perpetually stupid. As utterly annoying as this obviously was, how much of it was a genuine threat or vandalism to the wiki? I'm asking not to imply an answer, just to ask. If he's real rather than just a wind-up merchant he's certainly a godmoddery felon of the highest order. But isn't that just a link?
(Also - I use Netscape Navigator and am frequently logged out between a preview and saving. However, I don't believe Quebrada is for real - but what could be real is that a precedent for banning periods may be set which may be inappropriate in the future) Sacco and Vanzetti 18:49, 22 Nov 2004 (GMT)
