Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nakism/Archive"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote ( | + | <h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (0/5/1) </h3> |
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
# It just looks a bit too similar to the Nazism Wikipedia article linked above by Gruen. Even though that in itself isn't a bad thing, it's not original enough for a featured article I think :: [[User:BramP|BramP]] 22:53, 15 October 2006 (GMT) | # It just looks a bit too similar to the Nazism Wikipedia article linked above by Gruen. Even though that in itself isn't a bad thing, it's not original enough for a featured article I think :: [[User:BramP|BramP]] 22:53, 15 October 2006 (GMT) | ||
# Rip-off of a wikipedia article, thus very unoriginal. --'''[[Swilatia|<font color="red">sw</font>]][[User:Swilatia|<font color="green">il</font>]][[User Talk: Swilatia|<font color= "yellow">at</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Swilatia|<font color="blue">ia</font>]]''' 12:48, 5 December 2006 (GMT) | # Rip-off of a wikipedia article, thus very unoriginal. --'''[[Swilatia|<font color="red">sw</font>]][[User:Swilatia|<font color="green">il</font>]][[User Talk: Swilatia|<font color= "yellow">at</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Swilatia|<font color="blue">ia</font>]]''' 12:48, 5 December 2006 (GMT) | ||
| + | # Agreed re: above comments. You're taking a few too many liberties with the concept of free-use literature and free documentation. (( [[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] )) <small>Time sent:</small> 19:56, 21 December 2006 (GMT) | ||
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' | ||
Revision as of 15:56, 21 December 2006
Nakism/Archive FAC Vote (0/5/1)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
-
Good article. Lightman 18:25, 5 September 2006 (GMT)
Oppose
- On reflection, hard oppose. It's just a copy, and switching z's for k's really isn't that clever. ~Gruen2alk 10:56, 6 September 2006 (GMT)
- Agreed with Gruen. Jey° 14:56, 15 October 2006 (GMT)
- It just looks a bit too similar to the Nazism Wikipedia article linked above by Gruen. Even though that in itself isn't a bad thing, it's not original enough for a featured article I think :: BramP 22:53, 15 October 2006 (GMT)
- Rip-off of a wikipedia article, thus very unoriginal. --swilatia 12:48, 5 December 2006 (GMT)
- Agreed re: above comments. You're taking a few too many liberties with the concept of free-use literature and free documentation. (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 19:56, 21 December 2006 (GMT)
Neutral
-
Yes, it is a decent article. My neutral vote is a concern for precedent and image: do we want what is essentially a redub of Nazism on the front page of NSwiki? ~Gruen2alk 10:48, 6 September 2006 (GMT) - Neutral, leaning towards Oppose. It's quite complete, and I'm sure you've spent time writing it all, but there's nothing particularly original in it. Aridd 23:50, 14 October 2006 (GMT)
Comments/Questions
