Difference between revisions of "Talk:Menelmacar"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Constantina (Talk | contribs) (vote added) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== FAC Vote == | == FAC Vote == | ||
| − | <h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (3/ | + | <h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (3/5/0) </h3> |
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
# Oppose, for reasons previously stated. --[[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] 20:43, 12 November 2005 (GMT) | # Oppose, for reasons previously stated. --[[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] 20:43, 12 November 2005 (GMT) | ||
# I would have to say the same; namely, when other FACs present a much better case to be a featured article. [[User:Macabees|Macabees]] 05:57, 10 December 2005 (GMT) | # I would have to say the same; namely, when other FACs present a much better case to be a featured article. [[User:Macabees|Macabees]] 05:57, 10 December 2005 (GMT) | ||
| + | # Sorry, but I must also be in opposition due to the reasons previously stated. [[Jey]] 00:28 30 January 2006 (GMT) | ||
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' | ||
Revision as of 20:29, 30 January 2006
I am not exactly sure what to do with all these headers. Thoughts? -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 15:04, 23 Oct 2004 (GMT)
FAC Vote
Menelmacar FAC Vote (3/5/0)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- It's a good, well written article, and would fit nicely on the main page. Nightbane 21:31, 4 August 2005 (GMT)
- Yes, I very much the layout: it's a good example of an in-depth nation article.Gruenberg 17:41, 9 August 2005 (GMT)
- Quite well organzied. Something of envy to others... --Constantina 17:07, 23 January 2006 (GMT)
Oppose
- This article is just a filling in of the CIA factbook pattern. So I fail to see why it would fit better on the main page than the many other CIA factbook patterned articles. Jester 22:17, 29 September 2005 (GMT)
- Same. It is a copied factbook, does not do anything unique. --|Knoot|KNOOtalk 23:23, 29 September 2005 (GMT)
- Oppose, for reasons previously stated. --Pacitalkia 20:43, 12 November 2005 (GMT)
- I would have to say the same; namely, when other FACs present a much better case to be a featured article. Macabees 05:57, 10 December 2005 (GMT)
- Sorry, but I must also be in opposition due to the reasons previously stated. Jey 00:28 30 January 2006 (GMT)
Neutral
Comments/Questions
