Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jey"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
# ''Tentative'' support. I feel it's a good article, but has a few too many empty sections and first person references. Still deserves to be featured, though. [[Ceorana|<span style="background:navy; color:red;">'''–|––'''</span>]] '''''[[User:Ceorana|<font color="#000080">Ceo</font>]] \ [[User talk:Ceorana|<font color="#ff0000">rant</font>]]''''' 01:06, 25 February 2006 (GMT) | # ''Tentative'' support. I feel it's a good article, but has a few too many empty sections and first person references. Still deserves to be featured, though. [[Ceorana|<span style="background:navy; color:red;">'''–|––'''</span>]] '''''[[User:Ceorana|<font color="#000080">Ceo</font>]] \ [[User talk:Ceorana|<font color="#ff0000">rant</font>]]''''' 01:06, 25 February 2006 (GMT) | ||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
| − | # Too many links to inclomplete pages (pages with blank sections), a little too messy, and no structure. Needs improvement if its to be featured. --'''[[Swilatia|<font color="red">sw</font>]][[User:Swilatia|<font color="green">il</font>]][[User Talk: Swilatia|<font color= "yellow">at</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Swilatia|<font color="blue">ia</font>]]''' 13:00, 5 March 2006 (GMT) | + | # Too many links to nonexistant or inclomplete pages (pages with blank sections), a little too messy, and no structure. Needs improvement if its to be featured. --'''[[Swilatia|<font color="red">sw</font>]][[User:Swilatia|<font color="green">il</font>]][[User Talk: Swilatia|<font color= "yellow">at</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Swilatia|<font color="blue">ia</font>]]''' 13:00, 5 March 2006 (GMT) |
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' | ||
Revision as of 09:02, 5 March 2006
Talk
Jey FAC Vote (2/1/2)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- I believe this article should be nominated for it's sheer brilance in quality writting. I feel that it deserves it's place in NSWiki history. I support as nominator. Nice Cool People 19:05, 24 February 2006 (GMT)
- Tentative support. I feel it's a good article, but has a few too many empty sections and first person references. Still deserves to be featured, though. –|–– Ceo \ rant 01:06, 25 February 2006 (GMT)
Oppose
- Too many links to nonexistant or inclomplete pages (pages with blank sections), a little too messy, and no structure. Needs improvement if its to be featured. --swilatia 13:00, 5 March 2006 (GMT)
Neutral
- Very good article, in my opinion, but still lacks structure, a large part being very irrelevent. If most of the Governement section is moved to a different article, then I will support nomination.Vuam and Isma 19:53, 24 February 2006 (GMT)
- Dead links are noticeable, a bit too many first-person refs, and the lists at the end could be tidied up. Try alternating the placement of your imageholders, left, right, left, right, if that also helps. Good article, but just needs a bit more work. (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 01:37, 25 February 2006 (GMT)
Comments/Questions
