Difference between revisions of "Talk:Second War of the Roach"
(*SARZONIA* IGNORED THE WAR) |
(Okay, folks.) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
I don't know who it was who said Roach-Busters ignored the war. I was the one who ignored the war and subsequently ignored both Roach-Busters and The Parthians for godmoding and as a result of the animosity that developed between me and Roach-Busters. I ultimately imposed a Death Penalty Ignore on R-B so his country *never* existed in my world. | I don't know who it was who said Roach-Busters ignored the war. I was the one who ignored the war and subsequently ignored both Roach-Busters and The Parthians for godmoding and as a result of the animosity that developed between me and Roach-Busters. I ultimately imposed a Death Penalty Ignore on R-B so his country *never* existed in my world. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Okay, folks. == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I understand that this is a little too hot to handle, still, for a lot of people, as this was a very influential topic for a long time on II. However, OOC animosity should '''not''' be directed into the formatting of the article, as it makes it look really, well, shall we say, dumb. I corrected the article's formatting, and will vouch for the IP-edit, because it is I who made the edit. [[User:142.104.250.115|142.104.250.115]] 01:36, 5 September 2005 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 21:36, 4 September 2005
Here's what RB calls the war: 'The War of Betrayal.'
Second War of the Roach FAC Vote (1/2/0)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- I nominted it because for the part that it covers, it is an exhaustive documentary on the causes, the details, and the outcome of the first front of the war. The second front has yet to begin.138.88.250.5 02:49, 28 Feb 2005 (GMT) 138.88.250.5 02:45, 28 Feb 2005 (GMT)Sarzonia
Oppose
- It is incomplete, and IMO is not sufficiently well presented. Rechze • (talk) 04:27, 26 Feb 2005 (GMT)
- I concur with Rechze. Besides, this isn't the best of NSwiki. For instance it only has two links in the whole article. I'd change my position if the format of the article were to be sufficiently improved. Nanakaland 19:50, 11 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- But do not forget that a featured article should be "Comprehensive: Covers the topic in its entirety; does not omit any major facts or details." quoted from: NSwiki:Featured_article_candidates. Rechze • (talk) 23:43, 11 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- The war was IGNOREd and is therefore meaningless. Isn't worth making a featured article because of that. If the war wasn't IGNOREd and the article (and war) were completed and tidied up, it probably would be worth it. Praetonia 17:44, 4 Jun 2005 (GMT)
Neutral
Comments/Questions
- As nominator of this article, Sarzonia, you are free to vote and leave your reasons for nomintion. Rechze • (talk) 04:27, 26 Feb 2005 (GMT)
*SARZONIA* IGNORED THE WAR
I don't know who it was who said Roach-Busters ignored the war. I was the one who ignored the war and subsequently ignored both Roach-Busters and The Parthians for godmoding and as a result of the animosity that developed between me and Roach-Busters. I ultimately imposed a Death Penalty Ignore on R-B so his country *never* existed in my world.
Okay, folks.
I understand that this is a little too hot to handle, still, for a lot of people, as this was a very influential topic for a long time on II. However, OOC animosity should not be directed into the formatting of the article, as it makes it look really, well, shall we say, dumb. I corrected the article's formatting, and will vouch for the IP-edit, because it is I who made the edit. 142.104.250.115 01:36, 5 September 2005 (GMT)
