Difference between revisions of "Category talk:UDP member regions"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Frisbeeteria (Talk | contribs) m |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
'''Delete''' | '''Delete''' | ||
| − | # I fail to see the purpose of having a category that can never grow beyond the three members and single topic in it. Let [[The West Pacific]] and the others create their own factbook. Apart from this alliance, most of their history is separate. The topic is enough and can be added to each of their factbooks | + | # I fail to see the purpose of having a category that can never grow beyond the three members and single topic in it. Let [[The West Pacific]] and the others create their own factbook. Apart from this alliance, most of their history is separate. The topic is enough and can be added to each of their factbooks. (edit - oops!) [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ ''Frisbeeteria'']] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>talk</small>]] 14:26, 19 Oct 2004 (GMT) |
| − | + | :'''Comment'''. Please sign edits on questions of deletion. --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 14:12, 19 Oct 2004 (GMT) | |
| − | ''' | + | ---- |
| − | + | '''Delete.''' I agree with Frisbeetaria. --[[User:Knootoss|Knoot]] 17:33, 19 Oct 2004 (GMT) | |
| − | + | ||
| − | ''' | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | ''' | + | |
| − | + | ||
Latest revision as of 13:33, 19 October 2004
Delete
- I fail to see the purpose of having a category that can never grow beyond the three members and single topic in it. Let The West Pacific and the others create their own factbook. Apart from this alliance, most of their history is separate. The topic is enough and can be added to each of their factbooks. (edit - oops!) → Frisbeeteria Θtalk 14:26, 19 Oct 2004 (GMT)
- Comment. Please sign edits on questions of deletion. --Goobergunch|? 14:12, 19 Oct 2004 (GMT)
Delete. I agree with Frisbeetaria. --Knoot 17:33, 19 Oct 2004 (GMT)
