Freedom of Assembly

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Revision as of 15:10, 30 September 2006 by Mikitivity (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Resolution history

Draft proposal

The Freedom of Assembly resolution was based on a proposal, Freedom of Extreme Beliefs, originally submitted by North Suffolk in August 2006. The UN Secretariat from the Most Glorious Hack called attention to the idea behind North Suffolk's proposal which lead to a number of UN members working on a more comprehensive draft proposal. Unfortunately, when Mikitivity contacted North Suffolk to arrange a collaboration, North Suffolk was no longer available. In a matter of weeks a final working draft, titled Freedom of Assembly had been agreed upon by an ad hoc committee composed of Ambassadors and diplomatic staff from a number of nations.

Telegram campaign

The Freedom of Assembly proposal was first submitted to the proposal queue in mid-August 2006. The proposal did not go through any significant changes. Twice, its sponsoring nation, Mikitivity, carpetted hundreds of UN Delegates with telegrams seeking support. After 7 submissions to the proposal queue, the proposal established quorum on Mon Sep 25 2006. Prior to reaching the UN Floor, the proposal recieved over 200 UN Delegate approvals. However, the proposal sat in the resolution queue for several extras while the Outlaw Necrophilia resolution was being debated.

Resolution text

Description:
The NationStates United Nations,


CONVINCED that the expression of different political opinions is crucial to the democratic process,


TAKING NOTE of article 3 of its resolution The Universal Bill of Rights, which grants individuals the right to peacefully assemble,


APPALLED that in some extreme cases the expression of these opinions has moved from political expressions into actual physical acts, sometimes resulting in harm to other people or the destruction of public or private property,


AWARE that the reaction towards the harm of others or the destruction of public or private property has been to not only restrict these acts, but to also discourage the expression of extreme differences in opinion and to prohibit the formation of political opposition groups,


1. REAFFIRMS the equal right of individuals to freely express any opinions in a political process, provided that these opinions do not result in harm to other people or to public or private property without consent,


2. ASSERTS that individuals should have the right to freely assemble with others who share even extreme political views in appropriate venues, in order to better work within domestic and international political systems in a peaceful way,


3. CONFIRMS that the right to assembly includes the formation and coordination of political opposition organizations, which should be permitted to advocate radical changes in their existing government or political system,


4. CONDEMNS any political organization that advocates harm to other people or to public or private property as a means to spread terror or to gain political influence,


5. CALLS UPON political organizations to seek political change through peaceful means, and


6. ENCOURAGES national governments to open their elections and political process to any political organization that is seeking to voice its opinions through peaceful means.

Votes For:
Votes Against:
Voting Ends:

Voting analysis

A poll was attached to the UN Floor Debate thread, asking UN Delegates, UN Members, and Non-UN Members if they supported, opposed, or were indifferent to the resolution.

Additional materials

Retrieved from "http://archive.nswiki.org/index.php?title=Freedom_of_Assembly&oldid=213947"