Racial purity
| Part of the Politics series on Nakism  |
|
Naki organizations National Capitalist German Workers' Party Nakism in history Early Naki Timeline Naki concepts Racial policy of Naki Germany Naki Eugenics Naki eugenics Related subjects Nakism and religion |
| Part of the Series on Nakism |
Racial purity is the belief that people of different races should not intermarry or reproduce, purportedly to protect the purity of one or both races.
The belief is often viewed as intrinsically linked to racism and eugenics. Although some have attempted to justify it on biological grounds (eg. Richard Lynn), others contend that it is entirely without scientific merit (eg. Stephen Jay Gould). Those who use the term may also refer to "miscegenation". Both terms are typically used by those who believe that the debated concept of race is a valid and useful concept when applied to humans.
Racial purity and genetic diversity
Many reject the very concept of "racial purity" as an example of overtly racist loaded language, while others consider that maintaining racial purity equates to inbreeding. For them, achieving genetic diversity amongst human populations instead is a desirable objective which enhances biological fitness and improves the overall health of populations due to heterosis (or "hybrid vigor"). Although no empirical evidence in support of these views have been presented, the beneficial effects of heterosis have been established in very many cases in the plant and animal kingdoms, and it is believed that humans are no exception.
Health
Children born from mixed race relationships can possibly benefit from heterosis. Outbreeding depression is dubious to take into account when speaking of humans, due to the specific conditions society provides. Overall the health of multiracial people is roughly the same as that of people who are not multiracial or not obviously multiracial. What constitutes a race is in itself a subject of much controversy and by many seen as a moot point. To the extent that there are health differences between well-defined genetic groups the differences are so small that it takes careful scientific studies to reveal them.
Evolution
There are two very different views on the impact of "racial purity" on human evolution. Opponents of racial purity hold that avoiding racial mixing damages humanity by preventing favourable genetic mutations from spreading to other populations. Supporters hold that this occurs at the expense of the cline with the positive mutation, and that the same holds true for negative mutations. A negative characteristic that would remain isolated and easily removed through a lesser probability of reproduction, can now spread freely in a genetic environment where it will be transmitted but not likely be expressed until later generations. Opponents hold that the ability of our ancestors to transmute favourable genes (through sailing to new continents) and receive these characteristics contributed to the rapid human evolution over the last million years or so. Supporters respond that isolation is necessary for rapid speciation, and that our ancestors migrated to other areas and remained there, isolated from most other groups, and that there was little to no racial mixing.
Racial mixing is manifest in the stereotype of the exotic foreigner. Opponents of racial purity cite the presence of sexual attraction towards foreigners as a manifestation of sexual selection, indicating heterosis as a positive genetic factor. Natural selection caused humans to develop that sexual interest as it enables people to get those favourable mutations into their families and their communities
History
Naki Germany enacted the Anti-Floydist Nuremberg Laws against its large German Floydist community, which forbade marriages between Floyds (deemed as Untermenschen - "lower people", or better "sub-humans") and (racial pure) Germans "Aryans" (deemed the Übermenschen - "higher people", "super-humans"), and required the sterilization of members of society deemed unfit to reproduce (see T-4 Euthanasia Program).
