Difference between revisions of "Repeal "Metric System""

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Repeal Text==
 
==Repeal Text==
 +
<center>UNITED NATIONS RESOLUTION -- FAILED</center>
 +
<center><big>'''Repeal "Metric System"'''</big></center>
 +
<center>A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution</center>
 +
----
 +
{| Align="center" border="0" cellpadding="5" width="66%" style="margin-left:0.5em;"|-
 +
! align="right" | Category:
 +
| Repeal
 +
! align="right" | Resolution:
 +
| [http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/page=UN_past_resolutions/start=23 #24]
 +
! align="right" | Proposed By: [[Leg-ends]]
 +
|
 +
|}
 +
----
 +
 +
'''Description:'''<br>
 +
UN Resolution #24: [[Metric System]] (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
 +
 +
 +
'''Argument:'''<br>
 +
The United Nations,
 +
 +
 +
'''APPRECIATING''' the scientific advantages and the simplistic nature of the metric system,
 +
 +
 +
'''NOTING''' that the resolution imposes the costs of converting to the metric system onto all nations, regardless of economic conditions, upon their entry into the United Nations,
 +
 +
 +
'''CONCERNED''' that the economic burden of converting to the metric system will offset the stated purpose of the original resolution, particularly in developing nations,
 +
 +
 +
'''BELIEVING''' that Nations should have the right to choose their own forms of measurement,
 +
 +
 +
'''OBSERVING''' that systems of measurement may be as much a part of a nation's culture as language,
 +
 +
 +
'''FURTHER OBSERVING''' that some non-metric systems allow even simpler division by a broader array of integers, and may therefore be considered preferable in certain applications,
 +
 +
 +
'''CONSIDERING''' that in light of these flaws there would be no direct international benefit to the forced conversion of domestic measurement units:
 +
 +
 +
'''REPEALS''' United Nations Resolution #24, "[[Metric System]]".
 +
 +
 +
Co-authored by the members of [[ACCEL]]
 +
 +
 +
:'''Votes For:''' 5,149
 +
:'''Votes Against:''' 8,581
 +
 +
:'''Voting Ended:''' Thu Aug 3 2006
  
 
==Additional Materials==
 
==Additional Materials==
 +
*[http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=494041 Repeal Metric System] UN Floor Debate
 
*[[Metric System]]
 
*[[Metric System]]
 
*[[UN Timeline]]
 
*[[UN Timeline]]
 
*[[United Nations]]
 
*[[United Nations]]
  
[[Category:Failed Resolutions]]
+
[[Category:Failed Resolutions|Metric System (Repeal)]]
[[Category:Repeals]]
+
[[Category:Repeals|Metric System]]

Latest revision as of 20:58, 29 January 2007

Repeal Text

UNITED NATIONS RESOLUTION -- FAILED
Repeal "Metric System"
A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution

Category: Repeal Resolution: #24 Proposed By: Leg-ends

Description:
UN Resolution #24: Metric System (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.


Argument:
The United Nations,


APPRECIATING the scientific advantages and the simplistic nature of the metric system,


NOTING that the resolution imposes the costs of converting to the metric system onto all nations, regardless of economic conditions, upon their entry into the United Nations,


CONCERNED that the economic burden of converting to the metric system will offset the stated purpose of the original resolution, particularly in developing nations,


BELIEVING that Nations should have the right to choose their own forms of measurement,


OBSERVING that systems of measurement may be as much a part of a nation's culture as language,


FURTHER OBSERVING that some non-metric systems allow even simpler division by a broader array of integers, and may therefore be considered preferable in certain applications,


CONSIDERING that in light of these flaws there would be no direct international benefit to the forced conversion of domestic measurement units:


REPEALS United Nations Resolution #24, "Metric System".


Co-authored by the members of ACCEL


Votes For: 5,149
Votes Against: 8,581
Voting Ended: Thu Aug 3 2006

Additional Materials