Difference between revisions of "Talk:Danaan Monarchy"

Revision as of 00:54, 19 February 2006

Danaan Monarchy FAC Vote (4/0/1)

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

1. I feel this article offers something in its subject matter and depth that makes it unique amongst other FACs. It is an excellent example article, and anybody writing articles about NS monarchies would do well to treat the topic with this sort of depth. --Pantocratoria 18:30, 4 February 2006 (GMT)
2. And yet an other fine example of what happens when a player decides to dedicate time and effort to NationStates - magnificent and thorough articles on matters many (including myself) sort of tend to... uhm... leave aside. This one definetely deserves to be Featured. Jester 18:46, 4 February 2006 (GMT)
3. Looks good. → Ceo \ squawk 20:17, 4 February 2006 (GMT)
4. Well written article. Support. Jey 07:09 13 Februaru 2006 (GMT)

Oppose

1. I am certainly appreciative of the time spent on this article, but frankly, the layout of it is nothing special, and the image at the end is not placed in the best position (that on top of its enormous size). I recommend you decrease the image resolution, remove those dead links unless you're planning to create those pages anytime in the next four months, and possibly consider adding new pictures into the article body to, er, jazz up the article's look. (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 04:54, 19 February 2006 (GMT)

Neutral

1. It is a good page, but all of the dead links bother me a tad. Valori 02:24, 14 February 2006 (GMT)

Comments/Questions