Difference between revisions of "Talk:Danaan Monarchy"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
m |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
# I am certainly appreciative of the time spent on this article, but frankly, the layout of it is nothing special, and the image at the end is not placed in the best position (that on top of its enormous size). I recommend you decrease the image resolution, remove those dead links unless you're planning to create those pages anytime in the next four months, and possibly consider adding new pictures into the article body to, er, jazz up the article's look. (( [[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] )) <small>Time sent:</small> 04:54, 19 February 2006 (GMT) | # I am certainly appreciative of the time spent on this article, but frankly, the layout of it is nothing special, and the image at the end is not placed in the best position (that on top of its enormous size). I recommend you decrease the image resolution, remove those dead links unless you're planning to create those pages anytime in the next four months, and possibly consider adding new pictures into the article body to, er, jazz up the article's look. (( [[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] )) <small>Time sent:</small> 04:54, 19 February 2006 (GMT) | ||
| − | |||
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' | ||
| Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
'''Comments/Questions''' | '''Comments/Questions''' | ||
| − | * | + | * I am of the opinion that an article like this not only doesn't need many pictures, but that adding pictures would be inappropriate. "Jazzing up the article's look" with more pictures would only add some superficial visual excitement to people who don't want to actually read the article at the expense of the actual content, which is in depth and thorough, in the text of the article itself. I agree about the deadlinks though, and have made a smaller version of the arms of dominion to be uploaded soon. --[[User:Pantocratoria|Pantocratoria]] 06:34, 19 February 2006 (GMT) |
| + | ** Point taken, but I don't mean ten pictures. I mean, at the most, two. A picture of one of the members of the royal family, for example. (( [[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] )) <small>Time sent:</small> 08:03, 19 February 2006 (GMT) | ||
'''''Don't forget to update the vote tally!''''' | '''''Don't forget to update the vote tally!''''' | ||
Revision as of 04:03, 19 February 2006
Danaan Monarchy FAC Vote (4/1/1)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- I feel this article offers something in its subject matter and depth that makes it unique amongst other FACs. It is an excellent example article, and anybody writing articles about NS monarchies would do well to treat the topic with this sort of depth. --Pantocratoria 18:30, 4 February 2006 (GMT)
- And yet an other fine example of what happens when a player decides to dedicate time and effort to NationStates - magnificent and thorough articles on matters many (including myself) sort of tend to... uhm... leave aside. This one definetely deserves to be Featured. Jester 18:46, 4 February 2006 (GMT)
- Looks good. → Ceo \ squawk 20:17, 4 February 2006 (GMT)
- Well written article. Support. Jey 07:09 13 Februaru 2006 (GMT)
Oppose
- I am certainly appreciative of the time spent on this article, but frankly, the layout of it is nothing special, and the image at the end is not placed in the best position (that on top of its enormous size). I recommend you decrease the image resolution, remove those dead links unless you're planning to create those pages anytime in the next four months, and possibly consider adding new pictures into the article body to, er, jazz up the article's look. (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 04:54, 19 February 2006 (GMT)
Neutral
- It is a good page, but all of the dead links bother me a tad. Valori 02:24, 14 February 2006 (GMT)
Comments/Questions
- I am of the opinion that an article like this not only doesn't need many pictures, but that adding pictures would be inappropriate. "Jazzing up the article's look" with more pictures would only add some superficial visual excitement to people who don't want to actually read the article at the expense of the actual content, which is in depth and thorough, in the text of the article itself. I agree about the deadlinks though, and have made a smaller version of the arms of dominion to be uploaded soon. --Pantocratoria 06:34, 19 February 2006 (GMT)
Don't forget to update the vote tally!
