Difference between revisions of "Talk:Economic, Political, and Civil Rankings"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
m (→New Name Needed) |
Gruenberg2 (Talk | contribs) (Responding to Ecopoeia's point: yes, Struggling should be higher, and yes, Widely Abused is tops) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
But what? Find a new name, and then this page needs to be moved. Also, it seems like it belongs in a category, although it's not really obvious which one it is. --[[User:Athamasha|Athamasha]] 22:01, 7 Dec 2004 (GMT) | But what? Find a new name, and then this page needs to be moved. Also, it seems like it belongs in a category, although it's not really obvious which one it is. --[[User:Athamasha|Athamasha]] 22:01, 7 Dec 2004 (GMT) | ||
:[[:Category:Game]]. It probably needs some links to and from as well [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>''talk''</small>]] 23:36, 7 Dec 2004 (GMT) | :[[:Category:Game]]. It probably needs some links to and from as well [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>''talk''</small>]] 23:36, 7 Dec 2004 (GMT) | ||
| − | + | :::Hard to imagine what this would link to: it's way too general. And I'm officially "adopting" this page. Which means I'll try to come up with a way to expand it in the near future. --[[User:Athamasha|Athamasha]] 02:36, 8 Dec 2004 (GMT) | |
| + | ::::Look in [[:Category:Game]] or [[:Category:Gameplaying]] - all those topics are general game-related topics, and some of them could surely link here. [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>''talk''</small>]] | ||
| + | :I suggest moving this page to "National Ratings" or "Economic, Political, and Civil Rankings". --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 23:51, 8 Dec 2004 (GMT) | ||
| + | ::Danke schoen, Goob. Good idea. --[[User:Athamasha|Athamasha]] 21:18, 9 Dec 2004 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Struggling is #3, not #5. --[[User:Czardas|Czardas]] 18 July 2005 07:30 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm pretty sure these are wrong. Struggling is a better economic state than both Weak & Fragile, while Widely Abused is the highest category for Civil Rights (and nigh-on unattainable). Anyone concur? --[[User:Ecopoeia|Ecopoeia]] | ||
| + | :Yes, I'm not sure why [[User:Czardas|Czardas]] changed Struggling, but you're right. Widely Abused and Frightening in Political have ping-ponged about, but I'm going with Scolopendra for the minute, who puts Widely Abused as highest. I also added a link to Euro's similar thread.[[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User_talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 13:51, 4 November 2005 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:51, 4 November 2005
New Name Needed
But what? Find a new name, and then this page needs to be moved. Also, it seems like it belongs in a category, although it's not really obvious which one it is. --Athamasha 22:01, 7 Dec 2004 (GMT)
- Category:Game. It probably needs some links to and from as well → Fris Θtalk 23:36, 7 Dec 2004 (GMT)
- Hard to imagine what this would link to: it's way too general. And I'm officially "adopting" this page. Which means I'll try to come up with a way to expand it in the near future. --Athamasha 02:36, 8 Dec 2004 (GMT)
- Look in Category:Game or Category:Gameplaying - all those topics are general game-related topics, and some of them could surely link here. → Fris Θtalk
- Hard to imagine what this would link to: it's way too general. And I'm officially "adopting" this page. Which means I'll try to come up with a way to expand it in the near future. --Athamasha 02:36, 8 Dec 2004 (GMT)
- I suggest moving this page to "National Ratings" or "Economic, Political, and Civil Rankings". --Goobergunch|? 23:51, 8 Dec 2004 (GMT)
- Danke schoen, Goob. Good idea. --Athamasha 21:18, 9 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Struggling is #3, not #5. --Czardas 18 July 2005 07:30 (GMT)
I'm pretty sure these are wrong. Struggling is a better economic state than both Weak & Fragile, while Widely Abused is the highest category for Civil Rights (and nigh-on unattainable). Anyone concur? --Ecopoeia
- Yes, I'm not sure why Czardas changed Struggling, but you're right. Widely Abused and Frightening in Political have ping-ponged about, but I'm going with Scolopendra for the minute, who puts Widely Abused as highest. I also added a link to Euro's similar thread.Gruen2alk 13:51, 4 November 2005 (GMT)
