Talk:Eireann Shamrock

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Revision as of 19:49, 2 February 2005 by 207.237.104.148 (Talk)

Jump to: navigation, search

Protection discussion

Eireann Shamrock has been protected against further editing. This is due to continued edits by a variety of IP users, noteably User:207.237.104.148 (talk), User:172.174.141.201 (talk), User: 70.186.67.165 (talk) and User:Irelands own (talk), all replacing approximately the same POV edits on the page. While it is impossible to be certain, it appears to be the work of a single user. Despite multiple edits, the changes have never been discussed as requested.

Protecting until consensus is reached. → Fris Θtalk 22:59, 31 Jan 2005 (GMT)


  • There is a real tug of war going on with this page!!! - (unsigned edit by User:217.114.165.34)

Yeah, well I'm pretty happy with the current version... Prodigal Fenian / Eire Shamrock himself comes on here and amends it to make it read obviously a hell of a lot more favourably than it currently does... I don't know how you would suggest getting consensus!

_____

This page is a gross violation of all that the Nationstates Wikipedia stands for. Clearly more than one person had edited this, as not only Prodigal Fenian/ Eire Shamrock edits it, but others that like this nation have also helped out. There is supposedly a neutrality/non bias aspect to Wikipedia, yet this entry and the initial entry on ES/PF were and are completely biased against him! There are several parts to this that are extremely controversial, the first being that PF/ES is a villain to many, hero to few, and the part about how he may or may not have partaken in illicit substances when the man was simply outraged at what he considered a slight from moderators. This page must be re-written to be totally impartial as it is clear that both sides in this, the anti-PF as well as Pro-PF lobbies clearly have divergent views on this player. This current version, as well as the initial version are both a disgrace to what this Wikipedia stands for and should be re-written with an impartial view of PF/ES and not just this slander. Thank you