Talk:Gameplay/Archive

Gameplay/Archive FAC Vote (5/0/2)

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes (~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

1. I'm self-nominating this page as a FAC. → Fris Θtalk 20:01, 22 Nov 2004 (GMT) My intent was to codify the different levels of playing experience in NationStates, and I had hoped that others would step up and add any significant areas I missed. Since no one has added anything, I guess I did ok. Also, I'd like to see featured articles represent a broader base than just natives and regions, and this is the best Gameplaying article I've seen.
2. Very comprehensive and informative analysis. -- Wilem Engelking 11:27, 9 Dec 2004 (GMT)
3. As said above very factually correct and informative TBF 21:01, 28 Dec 2004 (GMT)
4. In addition to what has already been asserted above, I believe it to be well composed. Rechze • (talk) 09:07, 7 Jan 2005 (GMT)
5. Agree (every time I try to edit I get logged out) Nevareion --80.3.160.8 13:08, 7 Jan 2005 (GMT)

Oppose

Neutral

1. This isn't the best article I've seen, but it isn't the worst, either. I don't like it, but I don't hate it. Improvements to this article might change my position. Nanakaland 19:59, 11 Mar 2005 (GMT)
2. There's no real defect with the article in my opinion, but I don't think think it is quite up there as an example of the best of NSwiki, even though it is quite a good explanation of gameplay. --Pantocratoria 07:59, 23 Mar 2005 (GMT)
3. It seems to be a very good "cover-all" type of page, but I'm not certain if it would introduce a lot of information that would be new to the reader. Most people know a good deal of the information presented before they even find the NSWiki. Good information however, so while I am officially neutral, I would lean it towards Support if it had a teeny bit more information, and maybe a slightly different format.

GameJunkieJim 04:18, 11 Jul 2005 (GMT)

Comments/Questions

• To be fair I think it has got too many tiny paragraphs with small titles and I'm not too fond of the indents either. The game terms table should also be moved down and placed in context by integrating it in the 'languageplay' section IMO. Its cluttery, at present. I'd rework it but I would like to have opinions on this first, if possible. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 12:10, 7 Jan 2005 (GMT)