Difference between revisions of "Talk:Menelmacar"

Revision as of 10:59, 14 February 2006

I am not exactly sure what to do with all these headers. Thoughts? -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 15:04, 23 Oct 2004 (GMT)

FAC Vote

Menelmacar FAC Vote (3/5/0)

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

1. It's a good, well written article, and would fit nicely on the main page. Nightbane 21:31, 4 August 2005 (GMT)
2. Yes, I very much the layout: it's a good example of an in-depth nation article.Gruenberg 17:41, 9 August 2005 (GMT)
3. Quite well organzied. Something of envy to others... --Constantina 17:07, 23 January 2006 (GMT)

Oppose

1. This article is just a filling in of the CIA factbook pattern. So I fail to see why it would fit better on the main page than the many other CIA factbook patterned articles. Jester 22:17, 29 September 2005 (GMT)
2. Same. It is a copied factbook, does not do anything unique. --|Knoot|KNOOtalk 23:23, 29 September 2005 (GMT)
3. Oppose, for reasons previously stated. --Pacitalkia 20:43, 12 November 2005 (GMT)
4. I would have to say the same; namely, when other FACs present a much better case to be a featured article. Macabees 05:57, 10 December 2005 (GMT)
5. Sorry, but I must also be in opposition due to the reasons previously stated. Jey 00:28 31 January 2006 (GMT)
6. My views echo those stated above. Too many "$field: $variable" lists. I dont think it would look very good on the front page - more text, pics and wikilinks needed IMO. Praetonia

Neutral

Comments/Questions