Difference between revisions of "Talk:Niploma"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Gruenberg2 (Talk | contribs) (Neutral.) |
m |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' | ||
# Not bad in principle, but the grammar is not great, and it's awkwardly presented. However, not a bad example of a main page. [[Special:Contributions/Gruenberg2|<font color="blue">~</font>]][[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 10:50, 6 September 2006 (GMT) | # Not bad in principle, but the grammar is not great, and it's awkwardly presented. However, not a bad example of a main page. [[Special:Contributions/Gruenberg2|<font color="blue">~</font>]][[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 10:50, 6 September 2006 (GMT) | ||
| + | # Good start, but agreed with Gruen that the presentation of it needs some tweaking. Content is solid. (( [[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] )) <small>Time sent:</small> 05:25, 13 October 2006 (GMT) | ||
'''Comments/Questions''' | '''Comments/Questions''' | ||
Revision as of 01:25, 13 October 2006
Niploma FAC Vote (1/2/1)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote. NO, REALLY.
Support
- Here here! Say yes! The preceding unsigned comment was written by User:Niploma
Oppose
- The pictures are almost all oversized, the political parties table uses several invalid values for the bgcolor attribute (specifically, orange, gold, rose, brown, and azure), which causes strange results in some browsers, rendering text unreadable, and the infobox is so badly slanied that I can’t even begin to explain (the problems are probably related to the use of tables within tables and the value 0 for the colspan attribute). However, other than these issues, it seems to be a good article. —Commerce Heights (talk) 01:45, 21 June 2006 (GMT)
- Mild oppose, armed forces section needs cleanup, infobox and parties box need to be fixed per CH, prose isn't great. Probably could make it to feature quality with a little more work. Ceo \ rant \ rave
Neutral
- Not bad in principle, but the grammar is not great, and it's awkwardly presented. However, not a bad example of a main page. ~Gruen2alk 10:50, 6 September 2006 (GMT)
- Good start, but agreed with Gruen that the presentation of it needs some tweaking. Content is solid. (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 05:25, 13 October 2006 (GMT)
Comments/Questions
