Difference between revisions of "Talk:Noterelenda/Archive"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
m (fixed vote tally) |
Mikitivity (Talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | <h3 > {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote ( | + | <h3 > {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (&/0/0) </h3 > |
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
# Only one major conlang left to go for an FAC! But this one really stands out. ~ ''[[User:Ceorana|Ceo]]|[[User talk:Ceorana|<small>squawk</small>]]'' 02:26, November 24, 2005 (GMT) | # Only one major conlang left to go for an FAC! But this one really stands out. ~ ''[[User:Ceorana|Ceo]]|[[User talk:Ceorana|<small>squawk</small>]]'' 02:26, November 24, 2005 (GMT) | ||
# Without it, I wouldn’t have any bilingual states. :P [[User:Commerce Heights|Commerce Heights]] 20:57:41, 2005-12-02 (GMT) | # Without it, I wouldn’t have any bilingual states. :P [[User:Commerce Heights|Commerce Heights]] 20:57:41, 2005-12-02 (GMT) | ||
+ | # OK, this article is amazing. The level of detail is awesome, and the article itself is extremely well written. [[User:Mikitivity|Mikitivity]] 17:25, 8 December 2005 (GMT) | ||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' |
Revision as of 13:25, 8 December 2005
Noterelenda/Archive FAC Vote (&/0/0)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- Excellent article - I always enjoy reading it, and Bedi/CH have done an amazing job. Kudos to them for that. --Pacitalkia 05:46, 21 November 2005 (GMT)
- I feel honored that this article has been nominated and I'd like to thank Paci for his compliment above. As such, I too shall vote in support. --Bedistan (jon seplab) 23:33, 22 November 2005 (GMT)
- Another language article, but I like the way this one is put together. Neat, informative, easy to follow: a good model. Gruen2alk 23:39, 22 November 2005 (GMT)
- It seems that if you can be bothered to create a major lanugage then you get FAC, but I think this one flows better than the other language articles that have had that status. Starblaydia 00:15, 23 November 2005 (GMT)
- Only one major conlang left to go for an FAC! But this one really stands out. ~ Ceo|squawk 02:26, November 24, 2005 (GMT)
- Without it, I wouldn’t have any bilingual states. :P Commerce Heights 20:57:41, 2005-12-02 (GMT)
- OK, this article is amazing. The level of detail is awesome, and the article itself is extremely well written. Mikitivity 17:25, 8 December 2005 (GMT)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments/Questions