Difference between revisions of "Talk:Noterelenda/Archive"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Gruenberg2 (Talk | contribs) (Updating FAC vote: support. Well-written, attractive, interesting...good article too.) |
|||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <h3 > | + | <font color=#AAAAAA><h3> Noterelenda FAC Vote (9/0/1) <font color=red>'''CLOSED'''</font></h3> |
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
# I feel honored that this article has been nominated and I'd like to thank Paci for his compliment above. As such, I too shall vote in support. --[[User:Bedistan|Bedistan]] <small>[[Noterelenda|(]][[User talk:Bedistan|jon seplab]][[Noterelenda|)]]</small> 23:33, 22 November 2005 (GMT) | # I feel honored that this article has been nominated and I'd like to thank Paci for his compliment above. As such, I too shall vote in support. --[[User:Bedistan|Bedistan]] <small>[[Noterelenda|(]][[User talk:Bedistan|jon seplab]][[Noterelenda|)]]</small> 23:33, 22 November 2005 (GMT) | ||
# Another language article, but I like the way this one is put together. Neat, informative, easy to follow: a good model. [[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User_talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 23:39, 22 November 2005 (GMT) | # Another language article, but I like the way this one is put together. Neat, informative, easy to follow: a good model. [[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User_talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 23:39, 22 November 2005 (GMT) | ||
| + | # It seems that if you can be bothered to create a major lanugage then you get FAC, but I think this one flows better than the other language articles that have had that status. [[User:Starblaydia|Starblaydia]] 00:15, 23 November 2005 (GMT) | ||
| + | # Only one major conlang left to go for an FAC! But this one really stands out. ~ ''[[User:Ceorana|Ceo]]|[[User talk:Ceorana|<small>squawk</small>]]'' 02:26, November 24, 2005 (GMT) | ||
| + | # Without it, I wouldn’t have any bilingual states. :P [[User:Commerce Heights|Commerce Heights]] 20:57:41, 2005-12-02 (GMT) | ||
| + | # OK, this article is amazing. The level of detail is awesome, and the article itself is extremely well written. [[User:Mikitivity|Mikitivity]] 17:25, 8 December 2005 (GMT) | ||
| + | #Well written. I also like how this artical is set out, it's interesting but still organised. Overall I enjoyed reading it. [[User:United Island Empires|United Island Empires]] 18:32, 1 June 2006 (GMT) | ||
| + | #Very well written, interesting article. One of the best language articles. [[User:Antrium|Antrium]] 03:35, 13 December 2006 (GMT) | ||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
| Line 11: | Line 17: | ||
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' | ||
| − | #<br> | + | # Great article - But, we've already seen a language related feature article. As the time frame between featured article change is quite long, I'd suggest that other subjects be visited. Lets give consideration to other topics. --[[User:Domnonia|<font color="maroon">Dom</font>]][[User:Domnonia|<font color="maroon">nonia</font>]]-[[User_talk:Domnonia|<font color="black">'''talk'''</font>]] 02:22, 18 December 2006 (GMT)<br> |
'''Comments/Questions''' | '''Comments/Questions''' | ||
| + | :This or [[Great Southern War]] will be the next feature. [[Special:Contributions/Gruenberg2|<font color="blue">~</font>]][[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 10:51, 6 September 2006 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :[[Great Southern War|GSW]] should be next, as we appear to have let [[Danaan Monarchy]] jump the queue a bit. GreatGodOm's been waiting to see his up for a while. (( [[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] )) <small>Time sent:</small> 04:38, 8 September 2006 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:11, 20 October 2007
Noterelenda FAC Vote (9/0/1) CLOSED
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- Excellent article - I always enjoy reading it, and Bedi/CH have done an amazing job. Kudos to them for that. --Pacitalkia 05:46, 21 November 2005 (GMT)
- I feel honored that this article has been nominated and I'd like to thank Paci for his compliment above. As such, I too shall vote in support. --Bedistan (jon seplab) 23:33, 22 November 2005 (GMT)
- Another language article, but I like the way this one is put together. Neat, informative, easy to follow: a good model. Gruen2alk 23:39, 22 November 2005 (GMT)
- It seems that if you can be bothered to create a major lanugage then you get FAC, but I think this one flows better than the other language articles that have had that status. Starblaydia 00:15, 23 November 2005 (GMT)
- Only one major conlang left to go for an FAC! But this one really stands out. ~ Ceo|squawk 02:26, November 24, 2005 (GMT)
- Without it, I wouldn’t have any bilingual states. :P Commerce Heights 20:57:41, 2005-12-02 (GMT)
- OK, this article is amazing. The level of detail is awesome, and the article itself is extremely well written. Mikitivity 17:25, 8 December 2005 (GMT)
- Well written. I also like how this artical is set out, it's interesting but still organised. Overall I enjoyed reading it. United Island Empires 18:32, 1 June 2006 (GMT)
- Very well written, interesting article. One of the best language articles. Antrium 03:35, 13 December 2006 (GMT)
Oppose
Neutral
- Great article - But, we've already seen a language related feature article. As the time frame between featured article change is quite long, I'd suggest that other subjects be visited. Lets give consideration to other topics. --Domnonia-talk 02:22, 18 December 2006 (GMT)
Comments/Questions
- This or Great Southern War will be the next feature. ~Gruen2alk 10:51, 6 September 2006 (GMT)
- GSW should be next, as we appear to have let Danaan Monarchy jump the queue a bit. GreatGodOm's been waiting to see his up for a while. (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 04:38, 8 September 2006 (GMT)
