Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pacitalian"

Revision as of 16:19, 26 March 2005

Pacitalian FAC Vote (3/0/0)

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

1. Issue has been resolved. Rechze • (talk) 04:10, 27 Feb 2005 (GMT)
2. This is a very detailed, exceptionally well-written piece that brings life to a fictional language.Sarzonia 02:46, 28 Feb 2005 (GMT)
3. Nice article. One of the best fictional language articles on NSwiki. Nanakaland 20:14, 11 Mar 2005 (GMT)
4. Well done. Nice to see someone else has no life and spends it creating a realistic conlang! ~ Rejistania 20:19, 26 Mar 2005 (GMT)

Oppose

Neutral

1. I believe this is well done, but will not support it, only because of the formatting of long lists in the article. Rechze • (talk) 04:48, 26 Feb 2005 (GMT)
2. 
   

Comments/Questions

• Rechze, I am planning to modify the listings of nouns/adjectives/verb tenses into a three-column format to make the article shorter in length but not content. Pacitalia 05:38, 26 Feb 2005 (GMT)

That is the type of thing I had imagined would improve it, once that is done, it is quite likely I will change my vote. Rechze • (talk) 05:46, 26 Feb 2005 (GMT)

Okay, I changed the list formatting in everything to be an actual list. What do you think? Pacitalia 23:19, 26 Feb 2005 (GMT)