Difference between revisions of "Talk:S.H.O.D.A.N. v3.0"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
m |
|||
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | <h3 > {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote ( | + | <h3 > {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (5/0/4) </h3 > |
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
# No reason to oppose. [[User:Nightbane|Nightbane]] 21:29, 4 August 2005 (GMT) | # No reason to oppose. [[User:Nightbane|Nightbane]] 21:29, 4 August 2005 (GMT) | ||
# I concur as well! [[User:Kajal|Kajal]] 00:38, 4 October 2005 (GMT) | # I concur as well! [[User:Kajal|Kajal]] 00:38, 4 October 2005 (GMT) | ||
+ | # Tentative support - a bit too many dead links for my liking. --[[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] 00:53, 13 November 2005 (GMT) | ||
+ | # I think it's great. I can't fault on this article. --[[User:Constantina|<font face='verdana' color="orange">'''Constantina'''</font>]] 20:42, 27 February 2006 (GMT) | ||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' | ||
− | # | + | # The sentence structure seems to be a bit "backward", and sometimes pronouns, nouns, and verbs don't agree. I think the prose needs to be fixed up. → ''[[User:Ceorana|Ceo]]|[[User talk:Ceorana|<small>squawk</small>]]'' 04:46, November 25, 2005 (GMT) |
+ | # A bit short, a few too many red links, and a somewhat confusing read, but I wouldn't want to be opposed to this interesting article being featured at some stage. [[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User_talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 14:42, 7 March 2006 (GMT) | ||
+ | # Slightly underdeveloped to be considered for featuring. '''[[Jey|<font color="blue"><sup>J</sup></font>]][[User:Jey|<font color="red">e</font>]][[User_talk:Jey|<font color="green"><sub>y</sub></font>]][[Special:Contributions/Jey|<font color="purple"><sup>°</sup></font>]]''' 13:19, 15 October 2006 (GMT) | ||
+ | # I would agree with the above. All in all this is a good article, but it still needs a bit of expanding before it should be featured, with the red links and broken image rectified. [[User:Bettia|Bettia]] 08:58, 21 May 2007 (GMT) | ||
'''Comments/Questions''' | '''Comments/Questions''' |
Latest revision as of 00:20, 20 July 2007
S.H.O.D.A.N. v3.0 FAC Vote (5/0/4)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes (~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- Well written and constructed. Rechze • (talk) 01:50, 21 Jan 2005 (GMT)
- I concur. Nanakaland 20:06, 11 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- No reason to oppose. Nightbane 21:29, 4 August 2005 (GMT)
- I concur as well! Kajal 00:38, 4 October 2005 (GMT)
- Tentative support - a bit too many dead links for my liking. --Pacitalkia 00:53, 13 November 2005 (GMT)
- I think it's great. I can't fault on this article. --Constantina 20:42, 27 February 2006 (GMT)
Oppose
Neutral
- The sentence structure seems to be a bit "backward", and sometimes pronouns, nouns, and verbs don't agree. I think the prose needs to be fixed up. → Ceo|squawk 04:46, November 25, 2005 (GMT)
- A bit short, a few too many red links, and a somewhat confusing read, but I wouldn't want to be opposed to this interesting article being featured at some stage. Gruen2alk 14:42, 7 March 2006 (GMT)
- Slightly underdeveloped to be considered for featuring. Jey° 13:19, 15 October 2006 (GMT)
- I would agree with the above. All in all this is a good article, but it still needs a bit of expanding before it should be featured, with the red links and broken image rectified. Bettia 08:58, 21 May 2007 (GMT)
Comments/Questions