Difference between revisions of "Talk:The East Pacific"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | === [[the East Pacific]] FAC Vote ( | + | === [[the East Pacific]] FAC Vote (0/2/0) === |
*Just a request - could people please remember to sign their votes with 4 tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) and update the vote tally when they vote? Thanks. --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]] | *Just a request - could people please remember to sign their votes with 4 tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) and update the vote tally when they vote? Thanks. --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]] | ||
'''Support''' | '''Support''' | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
#I don't think this article meets the standard of "one of the finest examples of NSwiki's work." There's a lot that could be said about the East Pacific, and this article doesn't do it justice in my opinion. Is The East Pacific a subject that could get a featured article on it? Yes. Does the article at present qualify it for featured status? No. (Summary of opinion shamelessly stolen from Goobs CACE comment) --[[User:Knootoss| |Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 13:42, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)--Goobergunch|? 17:38, 24 Oct 2004 (GMT) | #I don't think this article meets the standard of "one of the finest examples of NSwiki's work." There's a lot that could be said about the East Pacific, and this article doesn't do it justice in my opinion. Is The East Pacific a subject that could get a featured article on it? Yes. Does the article at present qualify it for featured status? No. (Summary of opinion shamelessly stolen from Goobs CACE comment) --[[User:Knootoss| |Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 13:42, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)--Goobergunch|? 17:38, 24 Oct 2004 (GMT) | ||
| + | # Ummmm, no. Not at present, at least. [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ ''Frisbeeteria'']] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>talk</small>]] 16:15, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT) | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' | ||
# | # | ||
'''Comments/Questions''' | '''Comments/Questions''' | ||
| − | # | + | # I submitted it so that anyone who sees it may be inclined to add to the entry and therefore improve it, Especially those who know the prehistory of the region a little better such as Perhaps a Delegate history prior to Lothlandermore. [[User:Loop|Loop]] 18:37, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT) |
| + | #Hmmm... well, improving stuff is the general idea of NSWiki --[[User:Knootoss| |Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 18:47, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT) | ||
| + | # The suggestions for FAC nomination have been substantially upgraded, Loop. Click the Featured Article link at the top of the page. [[User:Loop|Loop]] 02:01, 29 Oct 2004 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Cleaned up the lay-out somewhat. Hope you like. --[[User:Knootoss| |Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 18:56, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT) | ||
| + | # Ill remove the featured doohicky from the region page then, but I want to keep this comment thingy here, | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Not a problem. :) --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 02:14, 29 Oct 2004 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:14, 28 October 2004
the East Pacific FAC Vote (0/2/0)
- Just a request - could people please remember to sign their votes with 4 tildes (~~~~) and update the vote tally when they vote? Thanks. --Goobergunch
Support
Oppose
- I don't think this article meets the standard of "one of the finest examples of NSwiki's work." There's a lot that could be said about the East Pacific, and this article doesn't do it justice in my opinion. Is The East Pacific a subject that could get a featured article on it? Yes. Does the article at present qualify it for featured status? No. (Summary of opinion shamelessly stolen from Goobs CACE comment) -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 13:42, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)--Goobergunch|? 17:38, 24 Oct 2004 (GMT)
- Ummmm, no. Not at present, at least. → Frisbeeteria Θtalk 16:15, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)
Neutral
Comments/Questions
- I submitted it so that anyone who sees it may be inclined to add to the entry and therefore improve it, Especially those who know the prehistory of the region a little better such as Perhaps a Delegate history prior to Lothlandermore. Loop 18:37, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)
- Hmmm... well, improving stuff is the general idea of NSWiki -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 18:47, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)
- The suggestions for FAC nomination have been substantially upgraded, Loop. Click the Featured Article link at the top of the page. Loop 02:01, 29 Oct 2004 (GMT)
Cleaned up the lay-out somewhat. Hope you like. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 18:56, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)
- Ill remove the featured doohicky from the region page then, but I want to keep this comment thingy here,
- Not a problem. :) --Goobergunch|? 02:14, 29 Oct 2004 (GMT)
