Difference between revisions of "Talk:The East Pacific"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
(the East Pacific FAC Vote (0/2/0))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FAC}}
 
----
 
 
=== [[the East Pacific]] FAC Vote (0/2/0) ===
 
=== [[the East Pacific]] FAC Vote (0/2/0) ===
 
*Just a request - could people please remember to sign their votes with 4 tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) and update the vote tally when they vote? Thanks. --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]
 
*Just a request - could people please remember to sign their votes with 4 tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) and update the vote tally when they vote? Thanks. --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]
Line 21: Line 19:
 
Cleaned up the lay-out somewhat. Hope you like. --[[User:Knootoss| |Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 18:56, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)
 
Cleaned up the lay-out somewhat. Hope you like. --[[User:Knootoss| |Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 18:56, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)
 
# Ill remove the featured doohicky from the region page then, but I want to keep this comment thingy here,  
 
# Ill remove the featured doohicky from the region page then, but I want to keep this comment thingy here,  
----
+
 
 +
:Not a problem. :) --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 02:14, 29 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Latest revision as of 22:14, 28 October 2004

the East Pacific FAC Vote (0/2/0)

  • Just a request - could people please remember to sign their votes with 4 tildes (~~~~) and update the vote tally when they vote? Thanks. --Goobergunch

Support

Oppose

  1. I don't think this article meets the standard of "one of the finest examples of NSwiki's work." There's a lot that could be said about the East Pacific, and this article doesn't do it justice in my opinion. Is The East Pacific a subject that could get a featured article on it? Yes. Does the article at present qualify it for featured status? No. (Summary of opinion shamelessly stolen from Goobs CACE comment) -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 13:42, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)--Goobergunch|? 17:38, 24 Oct 2004 (GMT)
  2. Ummmm, no. Not at present, at least. Frisbeeteria Θtalk 16:15, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Neutral

Comments/Questions

  1. I submitted it so that anyone who sees it may be inclined to add to the entry and therefore improve it, Especially those who know the prehistory of the region a little better such as Perhaps a Delegate history prior to Lothlandermore. Loop 18:37, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)
  2. Hmmm... well, improving stuff is the general idea of NSWiki -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 18:47, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)
  3. The suggestions for FAC nomination have been substantially upgraded, Loop. Click the Featured Article link at the top of the page. Loop 02:01, 29 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Cleaned up the lay-out somewhat. Hope you like. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 18:56, 28 Oct 2004 (GMT)

  1. Ill remove the featured doohicky from the region page then, but I want to keep this comment thingy here,
Not a problem. :) --Goobergunch|? 02:14, 29 Oct 2004 (GMT)