Difference between revisions of "Talk:UN Timeline"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
Is there any reason why this article shouldn't be moved to [[UN Timeline]]? --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 22:41, 19 Dec 2004 (GMT)
 
Is there any reason why this article shouldn't be moved to [[UN Timeline]]? --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 22:41, 19 Dec 2004 (GMT)
 +
:None whatsoever.  Moved. [[User:Frisbeeteria|&rarr; Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|&Theta;<small>''talk''</small>]] 00:11, 20 Dec 2004 (GMT)

Revision as of 20:11, 19 December 2004

Here is the old text, which I'm archiving here, because I'll be making a minor modification: "The official chronology of the United Nations only makes note of the passage of proposals. There is no corresponding record of failed resolutions, propositions that were pulled from the queue after achieving quorum but before going to a vote, and similar events that seemed quite important at the time. The following list is a chronology, assembled by meticulous study of forum topics past and the recollections of UN members and observers." Mikitivity 02:13, 19 Oct 2004 (GMT)

No need to keep a record of edits, the wiki does so automatically for all to see. Click the History tab for examples. Frisbeeteria Θtalk 02:15, 19 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Name

Is there any reason why this article shouldn't be moved to UN Timeline? --Goobergunch|? 22:41, 19 Dec 2004 (GMT)

None whatsoever. Moved. → Fris Θtalk 00:11, 20 Dec 2004 (GMT)