Difference between revisions of "User talk:207.237.104.148"

Revision as of 13:26, 10 January 2005

My earlier edits were taken down repeatedly, so we will all be removing these posts unless they follow the neutrality that is required.

Eireann Shamrock

Please do not replace NSwiki pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to NSwiki because they have a tendency to confuse users. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to NSwiki! Rechze • (talk) 11:28, 7 Jan 2005 (GMT)

"humorous" edits

Your edits to Northern Ireland have been reverted. It is likely that you have either not read or do not intend to follow the neutral point of view policy. If you continue to post POV materials to the wiki, they will be reverted or removed, and you will be blocked from editing. Please don't use NSwiki as a platform for expressing views banned on for the NS forums. This is the encylopedia of NationStates, not a place to vent personal feelings. → Fris Θtalk 12:48, 7 Jan 2005 (GMT)

I find it interesting how you are trying to hold me to a higher standard than others here. Why is this? I was attempting to tell the truth of NI, not "vent" personal feelings.

1. 1. Please don't remove comments placed on a talk page by another user. It's extremely rude.
   2. I'm not holding you to a higher standard, I'm bending over backwards to grant you exactly the same standard that I hold everyone else to. Players are granted a certain latitude with regards to invented background of fictional nations, but verifiable actions that occured in gameplay or on the forums are expected to be a balanced presentation of the truth.
   3. Almost every edit I've seen from this IP has either glorified Eireann Shamrock (the player) or vilified the mods. Neither is acceptable with NSwiki's NPOV policy. In some cases, I notified you requesting a change, but in other cases the POV edits amounted to vandalism and were deleted accordingly.
   4. "you" are an IP user who places unsigned posts from anonymous accounts. It would be a demonstration of the courage of your convictions if you were to create a user account and stand behind your words. I can assure you that you will get more respect, even from those who oppose you, when you come out from behind the shelter of anonymity. → Fris Θtalk 03:55, 9 Jan 2005 (GMT)

I'd sign up but I haven't had the time and was unfamiliar with the format. All I know is I was directed to this page which contained many errors so I've tried to correct them. I've never glorified "eireann shamrock", merely fixed the extremely negative summary that you allowed to act as his portrayal. I am puzzled as to why you didn't write similiar remarks to the original "Eireann shamrock" poster that wrote an extreme portrayal that is contrary to your NPOV standard -- the original message about "eireann shamrock" clearly defied your standard, so why was this person held to a different standard? People have a right to set the record straight in the quest for truth, perhaps I wouldn't have had to post had the original not been so slanderous and one sided.

freewebs

Freewebs doesn't allow cross-linking of photos. All any of us see it a link, http://www.freewebs.com/eireshamrock/. If you want a better server for pictures, read NSwiki:image use policy for a couple of suggestions. I like Photobucket.com myself. → Fris Θtalk 07:01, 8 Jan 2005 (GMT)