User talk:Anatania

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Revision as of 21:07, 13 January 2005 by Rechze (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Re:profile

ĉu vi parolas Esperanton? =) Canisius 04:06, 20 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Nathaniel A. Jones

You've got two different redirects pointing to an empty page. You gonna develop that, or are all three candidates for deletion? → Fris Θtalk 21:49, 29 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Please try to avoid creating empty placeholder articles. Empty articles are harmful to NSwiki, as they have a tendency to confuse readers. Creating them is also pointless, as it doesn't result in any sort of "reservation" or "owning" the article title. You are, of course, welcome to recreate this article when you have time to write it. -- Wilem Engelking 22:09, 11 Dec 2004 (GMT)


The nations Riegab and Gednu, have been created by you and put in your factbook. I'm just curious as to whether these nations are puppets of yours, and if so whether they have roleplaying histories of their own. If they do not then they are not needed, but if they do, then all is well. Rechze(talk) 02:09, 21 Dec 2004 (GMT)


Please do not replace NSwiki pages with blank or nearblank content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the NSwiki:deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to NSwiki!

The deletion policy will show you how one conventionally asks that pages are deleted. Though I respect your intentions , Rechze(talk) 03:45, 27 Dec 2004 (GMT)

Nation:Anatania

You are requesting the deletion of your nation page. Do you really want this? I have noticed that you have moved the information from it to different articles and accordingly placed them in a factbook. But even so, a fairly empty nation article is useful, because when a reader uses the encycopedia and wants to find out information about the nation Anatania , the logical thing to search for would be "Anatania". Even if this page is only used as a reference (linked from the page) to the other articles concerning your nation it would be useful. I hope that you may reconsider this. Sincerely, Rechze(talk) 04:51, 27 Dec 2004 (GMT)


It's just that, you still have a factbook for Anatania, with articles relating to Anatania, here. Rechze(talk) 01:04, 14 Jan 2005 (GMT)