Difference between revisions of "Ariddian government and judiciary"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The candidate for each party is chosen prior to the election by the members of that party. As there is no money in Ariddia, membership to all parties is free, which means that in practice any citizen can help decide who will be candidate for any party. However, while all major Ariddian political parties take part in most elections, they have all but completely ceased to launch political campaigns, as it is a foregone conclusion that the [[Democratic Communist Party]] will win any election. Relatively few Ariddians even still bother to vote in what has become little more than a ritual to maintain the DCP in power. | The candidate for each party is chosen prior to the election by the members of that party. As there is no money in Ariddia, membership to all parties is free, which means that in practice any citizen can help decide who will be candidate for any party. However, while all major Ariddian political parties take part in most elections, they have all but completely ceased to launch political campaigns, as it is a foregone conclusion that the [[Democratic Communist Party]] will win any election. Relatively few Ariddians even still bother to vote in what has become little more than a ritual to maintain the DCP in power. | ||
| − | Once elected, the Prime Secretary selects the members of the Council of Secretaries, the ministers who make up the executive branch of the government. His choice is submitted to Parliament, where it must meet with the approval of 60% of MPs. Recently, the Prime Secretary has often retained the exact same government after being re-elected, and its approval by Parliament has been a mere formality. | + | Once elected, the Prime Secretary selects the members of the '''Council of Secretaries''', the ministers who make up the executive branch of the government. His choice is submitted to Parliament, where it must meet with the approval of 60% of MPs. Recently, the Prime Secretary has often retained the exact same government after being re-elected, and its approval by Parliament has been a mere formality. |
The Prime Secretary and the Council of Secretaries are empowered to suggest laws for Parliament to vote on. They may also veto all or part of a law project Parliament is debating, before it is voted on. The Council sets the government’s general policies, and these policies form the guidelines within which Parliament must operate. Parliament may, by a two-third majority vote, dismiss the Council and call for fresh presidential elections, while the Prime Secretary may also dismiss Parliament. | The Prime Secretary and the Council of Secretaries are empowered to suggest laws for Parliament to vote on. They may also veto all or part of a law project Parliament is debating, before it is voted on. The Council sets the government’s general policies, and these policies form the guidelines within which Parliament must operate. Parliament may, by a two-third majority vote, dismiss the Council and call for fresh presidential elections, while the Prime Secretary may also dismiss Parliament. | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
==The Judiciary== | ==The Judiciary== | ||
| − | '' | + | The judiciary in the PDSRA is an independent branch of the government. New judges are appointed by a committee of their peers (the '''Judiciary Committee''', or Comité Judiciaire), elected by judges. Judges are empowered to interpret legislation where there is ambiguity, on the basis of precedents, but an appeal may be lodged by the defendant or plaintiff in any case to have any such interpretation by judges of the Prime Court (Cour Première) reviewed by Parliament. The appeal is examined by the Judiciary Committee, which decides whether or not to forward the case to Parliament. |
| + | |||
| + | There are three levels of courts: '''Judiciary Court''' (Cour Judiciaire), '''Court of Appeal''' (Cour d’Appel) and '''Prime Court''' (Cour Première). Judges of the Judiciary Court may allow or refuse an appeal to the Court of Appeal. Appeals from the Court of Appeal to the Prime Court may only be lodged if the case is without legal precedent, or if a legal precedent has been ignored or overturned. The Judiciary Committee decides whether a case should be brought to the Prime Court. Finally, a case may only continue beyond the Prime Court and all the way to Parliament if the Judiciary Committee agrees there are grounds to consider the judges of the Prime Court may have misinterpreted existing legislation. Parliament will then clarify the relevant points of legislation, and will refer the case back to the Prime Court. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Any court in session consists in four '''judges''' and two '''“factual assessors”'''. There is no jury. It is the duty of the factual assessors to investigate the issues at hand, and present to the judges an objective, unbiased account of the facts. The judges may then question the defendant, plaintiff, witnesses, and any experts of their choosing, as well as any recommended by the factual assessors. Any person involved has the right to request to speak up at any time. The four Judges must then reach a unanimous decision, verdict and, where applicable, sentence. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The court may be addressed in [[Wymgani]], [[French]] or [[English]] by any witness, expert, defendant or plaintiff, and the factual assessors and Judges may also express themselves in any of those three languages. Where necessary, translators will be present. | ||
==Wymgani self-government== | ==Wymgani self-government== | ||
| − | '' | + | '''[[Wymgani]]''' are the Indigenous people of [[Ariddia]], and currently comprise about 30% of the population, although there are no official statistics. To be deemed Wymgani, a person must be of at least partial Wymgani ethnic descent, must be recognised by a Wymgani community, and must, within the three years following his or her sixteenth birthday, report to a police station and declare his- or herself to be a Wymgani. |
| + | |||
| + | Wymgani meeting the requirements for Ariddian citizenship are Ariddian citizens will all the rights and duties such citizenship implies. However, in addition, they may be members of national and local Indigenous communities. On a national level, the '''Wehela Iolih''' (Indigenous Parliament) is empowered to review any law passed by Parliament, and state whether special provisions are required for its application to Wymgani people, based on Wymgani customs, local Wymgani laws, or related issues. Decisions by the Wehela Iolih on such matters are binding on Parliament. Members of the Wehela Iolih are elected by Wymgani citizens for a five-year term. Similarly to the election of the People’s Prime Parliament, Members of the Wehela Iolih are elected from nation-wide lists, and not as representatives of specific regions, islands or local communities. This is to ensure that they attend to the needs of all Wymgani, on a national basis. | ||
| + | |||
| + | While Wymgani citizens attend the same courts as [[Sele'eosh]] (non-Indigenous) citizens, any Wymgani defendant or plaintiff may require that a recognised expert on Wymgani customs and culture be present in court, if two or more judges or one or both factual assessors are non-Wymgani, to inform the judges of any specific and relevant issues pertaining to Wymgani. The choice of the expert is subject to the approval of the defendant, the plaintiff and the judges, while the Wymgani person requiring his or her presence may decide whether or not to allow a non-Indigenous expert. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Any court may, in addition, decide to refer a Wymgani defendant to judgement by his or her local community, in accordance with traditional Indigenous law, if the plaintiff does not object. | ||
| + | |||
| + | There is also a '''Wehela Aui u Sheho''' (Indigenous Land Court), presided over exclusively by Wymgani, and which is tasked with reviewing Wymgani land claims. This Court does very little today, as most land claims have long since been settled. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In any area, village, town or city in which a majority of the population is Wymgani, Wymgani traditional law, as interpreted by the '''Wymgani local community''', is recognised as overriding all other, conflicting legislation in most matters. Thus Sele’eosh minorities are subjected to Wymgani law on a local level, within certain minimal limits. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Wymgani communities consist in all Wymgani “adults” within a specified area. Traditionally, in pre-colonial times, Wymgani communities had no leaders, decisions being instead made communally. All Wymgani who had reached puberty were allowed a vote in community decisions. This is still the case today in fairly small Wymgani communities, but in cities, for example, it is deemed impractical. Thus, in any town or city with a Wymgani majority, all persons (of any ethnicity) who have reached puberty may vote to elect a committee of community leaders. In areas where Wymgani are a minority, local Wymgani communities retain significant authority to manage Wymgani affairs. | ||
==Semi-autonomous territories and provinces== | ==Semi-autonomous territories and provinces== | ||
Revision as of 07:54, 10 March 2006
The People’s Democratic Social Republic of Ariddia is a multi-party, democratic republic. The head of state is also the leader of the government, and holds the title of “Prime Secretary”; he or she heads the Council of Secretaries. The legislative branch is composed of a unicameral Parliament, the People’s Prime Parliament. The judiciary forms a separate branch of government, and Indigenous Ariddians retain significant rights of self-government as an Indigenous minority.
Contents
The Council of Secretaries
The Prime Secretary is elected by the citizens of Ariddia via direct vote. Elections take place every five years. All Ariddian nationals aged sixteen or over have the right to vote, as long as they are residing within the country. Voting is anonymous. Citizens express one primary vote for the candidate of their choosing, and may, if they wish, add “secondary votes” for as many candidates as they please, each of which will be worth one fifth of a primary vote.
To be elected, a candidate must obtain at least fifty percent plus one votes. If no candidate obtains this absolute majority, a second round to the election is held, but in practice this has never happened in recent years.
The candidate for each party is chosen prior to the election by the members of that party. As there is no money in Ariddia, membership to all parties is free, which means that in practice any citizen can help decide who will be candidate for any party. However, while all major Ariddian political parties take part in most elections, they have all but completely ceased to launch political campaigns, as it is a foregone conclusion that the Democratic Communist Party will win any election. Relatively few Ariddians even still bother to vote in what has become little more than a ritual to maintain the DCP in power.
Once elected, the Prime Secretary selects the members of the Council of Secretaries, the ministers who make up the executive branch of the government. His choice is submitted to Parliament, where it must meet with the approval of 60% of MPs. Recently, the Prime Secretary has often retained the exact same government after being re-elected, and its approval by Parliament has been a mere formality.
The Prime Secretary and the Council of Secretaries are empowered to suggest laws for Parliament to vote on. They may also veto all or part of a law project Parliament is debating, before it is voted on. The Council sets the government’s general policies, and these policies form the guidelines within which Parliament must operate. Parliament may, by a two-third majority vote, dismiss the Council and call for fresh presidential elections, while the Prime Secretary may also dismiss Parliament.
The Prime Secretary may veto a decision taken by the people by referendum, but must then immediately resign and call for fresh presidential elections. The citizens may also, at any time, call for a referendum to dismiss the Prime Secretary, which requires a 60% majority vote by the people.
Finally, members of the Council represent Ariddia abroad, in their respective fields of expertise.
The current Prime Secretary is Aj Ud, of the Democratic Communist Party.
The People’s Prime Parliament
The People’s Prime Parliament holds ninety-nine seats, which are filled by Members of Parliament. They are elected simultaneously, and at the same time as the Prime Secretary, every five years. Currently, the Democratic Communist Party holds a huge majority, with ninety-four seats.
Each party draws up a list of ninety-nine prospective MPs, and submits it to the citizens, who cast a vote for a single list. Thus, voting is on a national level, rather than each island or region electing a representative to Parliament. This is in keeping with Ariddia’s highly centralised views on government. All Ariddian nationals aged sixteen or over have the right to vote, as long as they are residing within the country.
Parliament is the legislative branch of government, and any MP may subject a proposal for debate. The proposal is initially submitted to the Council of Secretaries, who may reject it summarily, then, if not rejected, is discussed and voted on by Parliament. The Council must also decide whether the matter is important enough to be submitted to the people. If they deem it sufficiently so, and if Parliament votes in favour of the proposed law, then the law is subsequently submitted to the citizens via referendum. To effectively become law, it must be approved by a 75% majority.
Parliament is referred to as “the People’s Prime Parliament” to distinguish it from any local community meetings. Although governmental authority is centralised, local communities throughout the country are legally autonomous regarding a great number of purely local measures and policies, which are decided upon by citizens’ gatherings.
As indicated above, Parliament may dismiss the Council, just as the Council may dismiss Parliament.
The Judiciary
The judiciary in the PDSRA is an independent branch of the government. New judges are appointed by a committee of their peers (the Judiciary Committee, or Comité Judiciaire), elected by judges. Judges are empowered to interpret legislation where there is ambiguity, on the basis of precedents, but an appeal may be lodged by the defendant or plaintiff in any case to have any such interpretation by judges of the Prime Court (Cour Première) reviewed by Parliament. The appeal is examined by the Judiciary Committee, which decides whether or not to forward the case to Parliament.
There are three levels of courts: Judiciary Court (Cour Judiciaire), Court of Appeal (Cour d’Appel) and Prime Court (Cour Première). Judges of the Judiciary Court may allow or refuse an appeal to the Court of Appeal. Appeals from the Court of Appeal to the Prime Court may only be lodged if the case is without legal precedent, or if a legal precedent has been ignored or overturned. The Judiciary Committee decides whether a case should be brought to the Prime Court. Finally, a case may only continue beyond the Prime Court and all the way to Parliament if the Judiciary Committee agrees there are grounds to consider the judges of the Prime Court may have misinterpreted existing legislation. Parliament will then clarify the relevant points of legislation, and will refer the case back to the Prime Court.
Any court in session consists in four judges and two “factual assessors”. There is no jury. It is the duty of the factual assessors to investigate the issues at hand, and present to the judges an objective, unbiased account of the facts. The judges may then question the defendant, plaintiff, witnesses, and any experts of their choosing, as well as any recommended by the factual assessors. Any person involved has the right to request to speak up at any time. The four Judges must then reach a unanimous decision, verdict and, where applicable, sentence.
The court may be addressed in Wymgani, French or English by any witness, expert, defendant or plaintiff, and the factual assessors and Judges may also express themselves in any of those three languages. Where necessary, translators will be present.
Wymgani self-government
Wymgani are the Indigenous people of Ariddia, and currently comprise about 30% of the population, although there are no official statistics. To be deemed Wymgani, a person must be of at least partial Wymgani ethnic descent, must be recognised by a Wymgani community, and must, within the three years following his or her sixteenth birthday, report to a police station and declare his- or herself to be a Wymgani.
Wymgani meeting the requirements for Ariddian citizenship are Ariddian citizens will all the rights and duties such citizenship implies. However, in addition, they may be members of national and local Indigenous communities. On a national level, the Wehela Iolih (Indigenous Parliament) is empowered to review any law passed by Parliament, and state whether special provisions are required for its application to Wymgani people, based on Wymgani customs, local Wymgani laws, or related issues. Decisions by the Wehela Iolih on such matters are binding on Parliament. Members of the Wehela Iolih are elected by Wymgani citizens for a five-year term. Similarly to the election of the People’s Prime Parliament, Members of the Wehela Iolih are elected from nation-wide lists, and not as representatives of specific regions, islands or local communities. This is to ensure that they attend to the needs of all Wymgani, on a national basis.
While Wymgani citizens attend the same courts as Sele'eosh (non-Indigenous) citizens, any Wymgani defendant or plaintiff may require that a recognised expert on Wymgani customs and culture be present in court, if two or more judges or one or both factual assessors are non-Wymgani, to inform the judges of any specific and relevant issues pertaining to Wymgani. The choice of the expert is subject to the approval of the defendant, the plaintiff and the judges, while the Wymgani person requiring his or her presence may decide whether or not to allow a non-Indigenous expert.
Any court may, in addition, decide to refer a Wymgani defendant to judgement by his or her local community, in accordance with traditional Indigenous law, if the plaintiff does not object.
There is also a Wehela Aui u Sheho (Indigenous Land Court), presided over exclusively by Wymgani, and which is tasked with reviewing Wymgani land claims. This Court does very little today, as most land claims have long since been settled.
In any area, village, town or city in which a majority of the population is Wymgani, Wymgani traditional law, as interpreted by the Wymgani local community, is recognised as overriding all other, conflicting legislation in most matters. Thus Sele’eosh minorities are subjected to Wymgani law on a local level, within certain minimal limits.
Wymgani communities consist in all Wymgani “adults” within a specified area. Traditionally, in pre-colonial times, Wymgani communities had no leaders, decisions being instead made communally. All Wymgani who had reached puberty were allowed a vote in community decisions. This is still the case today in fairly small Wymgani communities, but in cities, for example, it is deemed impractical. Thus, in any town or city with a Wymgani majority, all persons (of any ethnicity) who have reached puberty may vote to elect a committee of community leaders. In areas where Wymgani are a minority, local Wymgani communities retain significant authority to manage Wymgani affairs.
Semi-autonomous territories and provinces
coming soon
