Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Rivers"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Nanakaland (Talk | contribs) m |
m (vote) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Delete''' and '''recreate''' as ''Geography'', then recategorize entries. [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>''talk''</small>]] 23:37, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT) | *'''Delete''' and '''recreate''' as ''Geography'', then recategorize entries. [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>''talk''</small>]] 23:37, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT) | ||
* Sure. A geography category would be nice. ~ [[User:Nanakaland|Nanakaland]] 19:33, 12 Mar 2005 (GMT) | * Sure. A geography category would be nice. ~ [[User:Nanakaland|Nanakaland]] 19:33, 12 Mar 2005 (GMT) | ||
| + | *'''Delete''' and '''recreate''' as ''Geography'' seems like the best idea to me. Rivers is too specific. --[[User:Eddie|Eddie]] 23:24, 18 Mar 2005 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 19:24, 18 March 2005
Procedural nomination. --Goobergunch|? 01:33, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)
I highly doubt that we need a category for something that only has one entry. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 20:01, 20 Feb 2005 (GMT)
- Very weak keep. Now contains two articles. --Goobergunch|? 01:33, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- Delete and change to something like geographical features. Rechze • (talk) 10:09, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- Delete and recreate as Geography, then recategorize entries. → Fris Θtalk 23:37, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- Sure. A geography category would be nice. ~ Nanakaland 19:33, 12 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- Delete and recreate as Geography seems like the best idea to me. Rivers is too specific. --Eddie 23:24, 18 Mar 2005 (GMT)
