Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Rivers"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Frisbeeteria (Talk | contribs) (Category:Geography created, articles moved, Category:Rivers deleted. This page can be deleted shortly.) |
(closing discussion) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{ConsensusToDelete|18 March 2005}} --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 19:18, 22 Mar 2005 (GMT)''' | ||
| + | |||
''Procedural nomination. --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 01:33, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)'' | ''Procedural nomination. --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 01:33, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)'' | ||
Latest revision as of 15:18, 22 March 2005
Deletion discussion
This discussion is now closed. The article was deleted by 18 March 2005 on {{{2}}}, with consensus to delete achieved. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. --Goobergunch|? 19:18, 22 Mar 2005 (GMT)
Procedural nomination. --Goobergunch|? 01:33, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)
I highly doubt that we need a category for something that only has one entry. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 20:01, 20 Feb 2005 (GMT)
- Very weak keep. Now contains two articles. --Goobergunch|? 01:33, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- Delete and change to something like geographical features. Rechze • (talk) 10:09, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- Delete and recreate as Geography, then recategorize entries. → Fris Θtalk 23:37, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- Sure. A geography category would be nice. ~ Nanakaland 19:33, 12 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- Delete and recreate as Geography seems like the best idea to me. Rivers is too specific. --Eddie 23:24, 18 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- Delete and recreate as Geography --Arturria 23:31, 18 Mar 2005 (GMT)
Category:Geography created, articles moved, Category:Rivers deleted. This page can be deleted shortly. → Fris Θtalk 23:45, 18 Mar 2005 (GMT)
