Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pantocratoria/Archive"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Guffingford (Talk | contribs) m |
m |
||
(18 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <font color=#AAAAAA><h3> Pantocratoria FAC Vote (10/0/0) <font color=red>'''CLOSED'''</font></h3> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | < | + | |
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ||
Line 26: | Line 6: | ||
#I guess this merits a feature. '''''[[User:Ceorana|<font color="#00CCCC">→ Ceo</font>]] \ [[User talk:Ceorana|<font color="#0066CC">squawk</font>]]''''' 14:20, 13 January 2006 (GMT) | #I guess this merits a feature. '''''[[User:Ceorana|<font color="#00CCCC">→ Ceo</font>]] \ [[User talk:Ceorana|<font color="#0066CC">squawk</font>]]''''' 14:20, 13 January 2006 (GMT) | ||
#Outstanding article. 'Nuff said. [[User:Guffingford|The Mystery Man]] 20:10, 14 January 2006 (GMT) | #Outstanding article. 'Nuff said. [[User:Guffingford|The Mystery Man]] 20:10, 14 January 2006 (GMT) | ||
+ | #Impressive and thorough. My compliments to the chef. (( [[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] )) <small>Time sent:</small> 18:57, 19 January 2006 (GMT) | ||
+ | #Nice enough. [[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User_talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 19:43, 19 January 2006 (GMT) | ||
+ | #A most excellent article. And I like the custom Infobox you made (I used it for mine.) Oh, and for the vote, ( ~~~~) ~Sys | ||
+ | #:Well thankyou very much, but if you're referring to the new nation infobox, I can't take the credit because I didn't make it, I just found it in my random wanderings through the template pages and used it. --[[User:Pantocratoria|Pantocratoria]] 13:25, 16 March 2006 (GMT) | ||
+ | #Well-written, thorough and informative. It's almost enough to make one believe that Pantocratoria is a real nation. --[[User:Ilclbt|Excalbia]] 20:32, 11 June 2006 (GMT) | ||
+ | #An oustanding article. [[User:Lightman|Lightman]] 01:17, 16 November 2006 (GMT) | ||
+ | #To echo Excalbia's comments, the article is such that it does make you think that Pantocratoria is a real place. If I could, my next holidays would surely be there. [[User:Uncle_Noel|Uncle Noel]] 19:02, 24th November 2006 | ||
+ | #The Latinian has a better article than me :( [[User:Jester|Jester]] 11:50, 13 December 2006 (GMT) | ||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' |
Latest revision as of 21:24, 19 July 2007
Pantocratoria FAC Vote (10/0/0) CLOSED
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- I'm nominating this because I consider it a very well-written and thoroughly thought out nation article. (~~~~)Owain Θtalk
- I guess this merits a feature. → Ceo \ squawk 14:20, 13 January 2006 (GMT)
- Outstanding article. 'Nuff said. The Mystery Man 20:10, 14 January 2006 (GMT)
- Impressive and thorough. My compliments to the chef. (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 18:57, 19 January 2006 (GMT)
- Nice enough. Gruen2alk 19:43, 19 January 2006 (GMT)
- A most excellent article. And I like the custom Infobox you made (I used it for mine.) Oh, and for the vote, ( ~~~~) ~Sys
- Well thankyou very much, but if you're referring to the new nation infobox, I can't take the credit because I didn't make it, I just found it in my random wanderings through the template pages and used it. --Pantocratoria 13:25, 16 March 2006 (GMT)
- Well-written, thorough and informative. It's almost enough to make one believe that Pantocratoria is a real nation. --Excalbia 20:32, 11 June 2006 (GMT)
- An oustanding article. Lightman 01:17, 16 November 2006 (GMT)
- To echo Excalbia's comments, the article is such that it does make you think that Pantocratoria is a real place. If I could, my next holidays would surely be there. Uncle Noel 19:02, 24th November 2006
- The Latinian has a better article than me :( Jester 11:50, 13 December 2006 (GMT)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments/Questions
I think the strong red and green colours used for political parties harm readibility. I presume the blue is paler in order for links to be readable, and the red and green would benefit from a similar change. Other than that, it's a impressive article. --Safalra 14:39, 13 January 2006 (GMT)