Difference between revisions of "NSWiki:Admin nominations"
(→Nominations for sysopship: Support) |
(→Nominations for sysopship: supporting myself, adding 3 plusses) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
''Current time is '''{{CURRENTTIME}}, {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}''' (UTC)'' | ''Current time is '''{{CURRENTTIME}}, {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}''' (UTC)'' | ||
| − | === [[User:Knootoss|Knootoss]] ( | + | === [[User:Knootoss|Knootoss]] (3/0/0) === |
I'd recommend [[Knootoss]] --[[User:Frisbeeteria|Frisbeeteria]] 01:55, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT) | I'd recommend [[Knootoss]] --[[User:Frisbeeteria|Frisbeeteria]] 01:55, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT) | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
'''Support''' | '''Support''' | ||
# I support. He's active and a good contributor. [[User:Crimmer|Crimmer]] 12:42, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT) | # I support. He's active and a good contributor. [[User:Crimmer|Crimmer]] 12:42, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT) | ||
| − | + | # [[User:Knootoss|Knoot]] accepts the nomination. | |
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
'''Comments/Questions''' | '''Comments/Questions''' | ||
| + | [[User:Knootoss|Knoot]]: Well, I'm not sure how to count the votes here (I'd say [[User:Frisbeeteria|Frisbeeteria]] counts as 'pro' too. The lesson of Florida: when in doubt, count the votes in your favour ;) Anyway I'll just wait untill people come and complain about my inherent bias and incompetence. | ||
==Nominations for bureaucratship== | ==Nominations for bureaucratship== | ||
Revision as of 12:19, 4 October 2004
|
See existing administrators.
To view previous nomination votes, see NSwiki:New admins.
Please use wikipedia:Requests for adminship as a guide for nominating and formatting.
Most importantly, an admin should have thorough knowledge of NSwiki and should visit meta pages often. It is preferred if the admin has had a large amount of edits (In the top 20% of editors), and contributes on a relatively regular basis.
As the Wikipedia guide linked to above indicates, only users who are registered and logged in can vote and/or be nominated.
If you don't know whether to nominate a user as a sysop or as a bureaucrat, go with "sysop" by default. If a user has been doing well as a sysop, then nominate him/her as a "bureaucrat."
Nominations for sysopship
Note: Nominations have to be accepted by the user in question. If you nominate a user, please also leave a message on their talk page and ask them to reply here if they accept the nomination.
Current time is 08:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Knootoss (3/0/0)
I'd recommend Knootoss --Frisbeeteria 01:55, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
- Heh. Thanks ^_^;;;; - Knoot 08:44, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
Support
- I support. He's active and a good contributor. Crimmer 12:42, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
- Knoot accepts the nomination.
Oppose
Neutral
Comments/Questions Knoot: Well, I'm not sure how to count the votes here (I'd say Frisbeeteria counts as 'pro' too. The lesson of Florida: when in doubt, count the votes in your favour ;) Anyway I'll just wait untill people come and complain about my inherent bias and incompetence.
