These pages are candidates for deletion by consensus. Please discuss each article on the appropriate article talk page - only edit this page to add or remove deletion candidates.

See NSwiki:Deletion policy for other types of deletion, including speedy deletion criteria.

To request that an article be deleted, please put an {{inclusion}} tag at the top of the article, post your reason for deletion on the article's talk page, and put the following under the current date (if the current date is not listed, post it below other dates):

=== [[PageToBeDeleted]] ([[Talk:PageToBeDeleted|add to this discussion]]) ===
{{Talk:PageToBeDeleted}}

where PageToBeDeleted is the name of the page you wish to delete.

January 13

USSR-ADN Trial/Text add to this discussion)

Deletion discussion

This discussion is now closed. The inclusion tag was removed by 15 May 2005 on ~~~~~, with no consensus to delete the article achieved. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. Please start a new section to discuss the article. --Goobergunch|? 16:27, 15 May 2005 (GMT)

Added to NSwiki:Deletion on 00:27, 13 Jan 2005 (GMT). Procedural nomination. --Goobergunch|?

This page is 56 kilobytes long; some browsers may have problems editing pages approaching or longer than 32KB. It also totally lacks any wiki links to other articles.

In addition, I'm quite sure that this document has been posted somewhere on the forums (be they NationStates or offsite) where this thing can easily be linked to instead of slowing down the wiki as per standing wiki policy.-- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 17:39, 30 Dec 2004 (GMT)

• Agreed. Rechze • (talk) 10:06, 13 Jan 2005 (GMT)
• Not really - Yet this was a major turning point in NS for many, and did change the ADN and NPO, who were the two major powers at the time. (unsigned edit by 68.56.172.224)
  • But is it available externally? Rechze • (talk) 03:36, 22 Jan 2005 (GMT)
• Concur with deletion. → Fris Θtalk 19:13, 22 Jan 2005 (GMT)
• Considering it is detailed elsewhere, and is copied here as a copious block of unsectioned, undivided and purely linear text, besides the space it consumes, this article strikes me as Wiki-unfriendly on the user level as well. To be quite frank, anyone wanting to refer to this would probably look at the lack of divisions and think "This'll take me ages, why bother?" Concur. IdioC- エドの狂いtalk 21:19, 22 Jan 2005 (GMT)

It is not available to the public anywhere else. The only other place is the USSR forums or ADN forums, both have to be registered, approved, and not IP banned.(unsigned edit by 68.56.172.224)

My sentiment lays neutral now then. Rechze • (talk) 06:28, 8 Feb 2005 (GMT)

• Note that is is inaccessible on the ADN forum because this decision was on the old (s3) forums, which are no longer open to anybody except Pope Hope and maybe another admin or two. However, source material such as this really isn't appropriate for the wiki, so I'm not going to vote yea or nay here. --Goobergunch|? 19:26, 8 Feb 2005 (GMT)
  • I'd say keep it, then. However, it needs to be wikified if kept, adding links and headings. ~ Nanakaland 19:45, 11 Mar 2005 (GMT)

January 20

Union_of_Socialist_Republics_Constitution (add to this discussion)

Deletion discussion

This discussion is now closed. The article was deleted by 15 May 2005 on {{{2}}}, with consensus to delete achieved. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. --Goobergunch|? 16:26, 15 May 2005 (GMT)

Surely there is a link to this static constitution somewhere on a forum that could be linked to from the main article of the region, rather than taking up space when it could easily be linked to. Rechze • (talk) 10:55, 20 Jan 2005 (GMT)
Seconded. I've added Level 3 category headings to it's easier to navigate and hopefully a better article in the rare event of it not being removed.IdioC- エドの狂いtalk 21:49, 22 Jan 2005 (GMT)

Just a note, this is linked by the region "Union of Socialist Republics" as their constitution, however this has nothing to do with that region. This is the costitution of the Haven-based alliance, not the region. ~Hallad

March 31

League_of_Empire_Loyalists (add to this discussion)

Deletion discussion

This discussion is now closed. The inclusion tag was removed by 24 April 2005 on ~~~~~, with no consensus to delete the article achieved. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. Please start a new section to discuss the article. --Goobergunch|? 20:53, 24 Apr 2005 (GMT)

The link on this particular article has been banned on NS, I thought NSwiki would do the same despite it being a seperate entity. -ITD-

• Comment. I have posted a request for a NationStates opinion on the NationStates forums. This request was made in my official capacity as NSwiki Founder. I will not be voting Keep or Delete at this time. --Goobergunch|? 01:16, 1 Apr 2005 (GMT)

• I've replaced a blatantly POV description of the Caelta complaint with a more accurate rendition of what has actually been reported in the NS Moderation forum. I also removed the link, on my authority of NSwiki sysop, as it does in fact contain sexual content, and we haven't been allowing that here. I will of course accept consensus rulings in this matter, and the link can be found in the History pages. Until consensus is reached, I would request that the link not be added back in to the page. → Fris Θtalk 23:48, 1 Apr 2005 (GMT)

I get the feeling this is irrelevant now; unless I mis-typed the URL about 5 times, the LOEL boards appear to have vanished from Invision. I'll keep trying and edit this accordingly, but it seems that the LOEL has finally (and none too soon) been laid to rest. - DPUO

• Based on the link in the page history, I concur. --Goobergunch|? 18:32, 3 Apr 2005 (GMT)