Difference between revisions of "NSWiki:Admin nominations"
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
'''Comments/Questions''' | '''Comments/Questions''' | ||
+ | |||
[[User:Knootoss|Knoot]]: Well, I'm not sure how to count the votes here (I'd say [[User:Frisbeeteria|Frisbeeteria]] counts as 'pro' too. The lesson of Florida: when in doubt, count the votes in your favour ;) Anyway I'll just wait untill people come and complain about my inherent bias and incompetence. | [[User:Knootoss|Knoot]]: Well, I'm not sure how to count the votes here (I'd say [[User:Frisbeeteria|Frisbeeteria]] counts as 'pro' too. The lesson of Florida: when in doubt, count the votes in your favour ;) Anyway I'll just wait untill people come and complain about my inherent bias and incompetence. | ||
:Meh. I don't count the nomination as a vote, but I'm for letting Frisbeeteria vote - when I nominated Defaultia, I immediately voted "1. [[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]][[Goobergunchia|ia]] As in nomination". --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]][[Goobergunchia|ia]] 16:34, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT) | :Meh. I don't count the nomination as a vote, but I'm for letting Frisbeeteria vote - when I nominated Defaultia, I immediately voted "1. [[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]][[Goobergunchia|ia]] As in nomination". --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]][[Goobergunchia|ia]] 16:34, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | You are too kind ^_^ *is a happy [Elves|elf]] now* | ||
==Nominations for bureaucratship== | ==Nominations for bureaucratship== |
Revision as of 18:40, 4 October 2004
|
See existing administrators.
To view previous nomination votes, see NSwiki:New admins.
Please use wikipedia:Requests for adminship as a guide for nominating and formatting.
Most importantly, an admin should have thorough knowledge of NSwiki and should visit meta pages often. It is preferred if the admin has had a large amount of edits (In the top 20% of editors), and contributes on a relatively regular basis.
As the Wikipedia guide linked to above indicates, only users who are registered and logged in can vote and/or be nominated.
If you don't know whether to nominate a user as a sysop or as a bureaucrat, go with "sysop" by default. If a user has been doing well as a sysop, then nominate him/her as a "bureaucrat."
Nominations for sysopship
Note: Nominations have to be accepted by the user in question. If you nominate a user, please also leave a message on their talk page and ask them to reply here if they accept the nomination.
Current time is 09:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Knootoss (4/0/0)
I'd recommend Knootoss --Frisbeeteria 01:55, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
- Heh. Thanks ^_^;;;; - Knoot 08:44, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
Support
- I support. He's active and a good contributor. Crimmer 12:42, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
- Knoot accepts the nomination.
- What Crimmer said, very active and very helpful edits. Also very helpful on IRC. --Goobergunchia 16:34, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
- Meh. My vote belongs in the tally for Knoot. --Frisbeeteria 18:04, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments/Questions
Knoot: Well, I'm not sure how to count the votes here (I'd say Frisbeeteria counts as 'pro' too. The lesson of Florida: when in doubt, count the votes in your favour ;) Anyway I'll just wait untill people come and complain about my inherent bias and incompetence.
- Meh. I don't count the nomination as a vote, but I'm for letting Frisbeeteria vote - when I nominated Defaultia, I immediately voted "1. Goobergunchia As in nomination". --Goobergunchia 16:34, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
You are too kind ^_^ *is a happy [Elves|elf]] now*