Difference between revisions of "NSWiki:Arbitration"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Statement of complaint: spelling and such)
m (rv)
 
(39 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:NS MetaWiki]]
+
{{NSwiki meta toc}}
{{NSwiki_meta_toc}}
+
 
+
 
This page exists only to discuss and resolve issues, like "edit wars" and serious disagreements about content.  Try to resolve the conflict using the specific page's discussion/talk page.  If, and only if, all other steps have failed, and you see no reasonable chance that the matter can be resolved in another manner, you may request that it be decided by the administrators here.
 
This page exists only to discuss and resolve issues, like "edit wars" and serious disagreements about content.  Try to resolve the conflict using the specific page's discussion/talk page.  If, and only if, all other steps have failed, and you see no reasonable chance that the matter can be resolved in another manner, you may request that it be decided by the administrators here.
  
 
If you support a particular position, list your username and reasoning.
 
If you support a particular position, list your username and reasoning.
  
We hope never to have to use this page!
+
'''Please sign all edits to this page with your username and time of posting by typing <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>.'''
  
 
==Format and Instructions==
 
==Format and Instructions==
Line 14: Line 12:
 
===Case===
 
===Case===
 
'''Users involved in dispute:'''<br>
 
'''Users involved in dispute:'''<br>
''Evidence and comments in this case should be directed to [[/CASENAME]]''
+
''Evidence and comments in this case should be directed to [[NSwiki:Arbitration/CASENAME]]''
 
==== Statement of complaint (signed by plantiff(s)) ====
 
==== Statement of complaint (signed by plantiff(s)) ====
 
==== Statement by affected party (signed by respondant(s)) ====
 
==== Statement by affected party (signed by respondant(s)) ====
==== Comments bv administrators ====
+
==== Comments bv administrators (0/0/0/0)====
 +
''The numbers in the Comments and votes by Arbitrators (0/0/0/0) section corresponds to Accept/Reject/Recuse/Other.''
 +
 
  
 
If an administrator decides to protect a page in question, he/she will add:
 
If an administrator decides to protect a page in question, he/she will add:
Line 34: Line 34:
  
 
== Requests for Arbitration ==
 
== Requests for Arbitration ==
=== [[User:Knootoss]] and [[User:Tanah Burung]] vs. [[User:Syskeyia]] ===
+
* [[NSwiki:Arbitration/Syskeyia#Motion to reopen|Motion to reopen User:Knootoss v. User:Syskeyia]] - Requested by [[User:Goobergunch]] on 15 December 2004.
'''Articles involved in this dispute: [[Tanah Burung]], [[Utrecht]]
+
 
+
''Evidence and comments in this case should be directed to [[/Syskeyia]]''
+
 
+
==== Statement of complaint ====
+
Well, I'm not sure about the use of arbitration as a means here but as goober suggested it I'll go with it. Thing is, Syskeyia has been misbehaving here for a while. Yes, he has made some useful contributions (which I welcome) but on the other hand I have to check every single entry he makes for childish comments and (sometimes) vandalism. Examples:
+
 
+
*[http://ns.goobergunch.net/wiki/index.php?title=Der_Angst&diff=2911&oldid=2905 Adding silly RL comments] in Der Angst entry, after which DA warned him clearly not to do it again.
+
*That did not stop him from [http://ns.goobergunch.net/wiki/index.php?title=Nineteenth_century_Knootoss&diff=4512&oldid=4245 Adding childish RL comments to my 19th century history] , which I subsequently removed with comment.
+
*[http://ns.goobergunch.net/wiki/index.php?title=SeOCC&diff=7483&oldid=7482 Adding 'Fuckian' as a language of SeOCC] was an example of plain vandalism. He was warned about this on his by me on his [[User_talk:Syskeyia|talk page]]. This was a clear violation of the rules. Syskeyia never bothered to respond to this warning.
+
*[http://ns.goobergunch.net/wiki/index.php?title=Knootian_independence&diff=5741&oldid=4544 Knootian independence] entry declaring that my edit was 'supposedly' written in 1581
+
*I consider [http://ns.goobergunch.net/wiki/index.php?title=Utrecht&diff=8577&oldid=8576 these edits to the Utrecht entry] to be childish and ''bordering'' on vandalism. Removing the link to [[Knootian independence]] to replace them with the implication that Lavenrunz is Spain certainly was over the line.
+
 
+
As a normal user (not as a sysop) I'd recommend that something be done about all of this. From our warnings AND all the reverting edit comments it should be abundantly clear that we did not want such edits. (And he reads the reverting edits, since he uses them himself to reply to MY reverting edits so it is IMO a bit difficult to feign ignorance on that matter.)
+
  
Now, seperate from this is the matter of the [[Tanah Burung]] entry. See the [[Talk:Tanah_Burung corresponding talk page]] and [http://ns.goobergunch.net/wiki/index.php?title=Tanah_Burung&action=history edit history], really. I'm willing to describe in more detail if that is required. --[[User:Knootoss| |Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 21:52, 22 Oct 2004 (GMT)
+
== Cases in arbitration ==
  
==== Statement by affected party ====
+
* [[NSwiki:Arbitration/FREE-ARMSDONIA]]
  
==== Comments by administrators====
+
== Decided cases ==
 +
* [[NSwiki:Arbitration/Syskeyia|User:Knootoss v. User:Syskeyia]] - '''Accepted''' for Arbitration on 23 October 2004 with two votes and one recusal.  '''Decided''' on 26 October 2004 to place User:Syskeyia on indefinite probation.
  
== Previous issues ==
+
[[Category:NS MetaWiki|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 +
[[Category:Dispute resolution|{{PAGENAME}}]]

Latest revision as of 15:55, 10 October 2007

Community Portal


This page exists only to discuss and resolve issues, like "edit wars" and serious disagreements about content. Try to resolve the conflict using the specific page's discussion/talk page. If, and only if, all other steps have failed, and you see no reasonable chance that the matter can be resolved in another manner, you may request that it be decided by the administrators here.

If you support a particular position, list your username and reasoning.

Please sign all edits to this page with your username and time of posting by typing ~~~~.

Format and Instructions

Use the following format to add an issue:

Case

Users involved in dispute:
Evidence and comments in this case should be directed to NSwiki:Arbitration/CASENAME

Statement of complaint (signed by plantiff(s))

Statement by affected party (signed by respondant(s))

Comments bv administrators (0/0/0/0)

The numbers in the Comments and votes by Arbitrators (0/0/0/0) section corresponds to Accept/Reject/Recuse/Other.


If an administrator decides to protect a page in question, he/she will add:

Page protected by <Administrator's Name> at

Unprotection of that page will be indicated by:

Page unprotected by <Administrator's Name> at <Time of Unprotection>

Keep the list of protections/unprotections in anti-chronological order, with most-recent on top.

Once the issue is resolved, indicate the following in addition to the above:

Description of Resolution:

Requests for Arbitration

Cases in arbitration

Decided cases

  • User:Knootoss v. User:Syskeyia - Accepted for Arbitration on 23 October 2004 with two votes and one recusal. Decided on 26 October 2004 to place User:Syskeyia on indefinite probation.