Difference between revisions of "NSWiki:Arbitration"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Requests for Arbitration)
m (rv)
 
(33 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:NS MetaWiki]]
+
{{NSwiki meta toc}}
{{NSwiki_meta_toc}}
+
 
+
 
This page exists only to discuss and resolve issues, like "edit wars" and serious disagreements about content.  Try to resolve the conflict using the specific page's discussion/talk page.  If, and only if, all other steps have failed, and you see no reasonable chance that the matter can be resolved in another manner, you may request that it be decided by the administrators here.
 
This page exists only to discuss and resolve issues, like "edit wars" and serious disagreements about content.  Try to resolve the conflict using the specific page's discussion/talk page.  If, and only if, all other steps have failed, and you see no reasonable chance that the matter can be resolved in another manner, you may request that it be decided by the administrators here.
  
 
If you support a particular position, list your username and reasoning.
 
If you support a particular position, list your username and reasoning.
  
We hope never to have to use this page!
+
'''Please sign all edits to this page with your username and time of posting by typing <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>.'''
  
 
==Format and Instructions==
 
==Format and Instructions==
Line 14: Line 12:
 
===Case===
 
===Case===
 
'''Users involved in dispute:'''<br>
 
'''Users involved in dispute:'''<br>
''Evidence and comments in this case should be directed to [[/CASENAME]]''
+
''Evidence and comments in this case should be directed to [[NSwiki:Arbitration/CASENAME]]''
 
==== Statement of complaint (signed by plantiff(s)) ====
 
==== Statement of complaint (signed by plantiff(s)) ====
 
==== Statement by affected party (signed by respondant(s)) ====
 
==== Statement by affected party (signed by respondant(s)) ====
==== Comments bv administrators ====
+
==== Comments bv administrators (0/0/0/0)====
 +
''The numbers in the Comments and votes by Arbitrators (0/0/0/0) section corresponds to Accept/Reject/Recuse/Other.''
 +
 
  
 
If an administrator decides to protect a page in question, he/she will add:
 
If an administrator decides to protect a page in question, he/she will add:
Line 34: Line 34:
  
 
== Requests for Arbitration ==
 
== Requests for Arbitration ==
=== [[User:Knootoss]] vs. [[User:Syskeyia]] ===
+
* [[NSwiki:Arbitration/Syskeyia#Motion to reopen|Motion to reopen User:Knootoss v. User:Syskeyia]] - Requested by [[User:Goobergunch]] on 15 December 2004.
'''Articles involved in this dispute: [[Tanah Burung]], [[Utrecht]]
+
 
+
''Evidence and comments in this case should be directed to [[/Syskeyia]]''
+
 
+
==== Statement of complaint ====
+
First some notes: 
+
*I will not be acting in my capacity of a Sysop in the matter regarding Religion in [[Tanah Burung]] as I have become an involved party.   
+
*Tanah Burung did not request arbitration. Starting arbitration procedure was a policy decision which was made, again, without my involvement as a sysop.   
+
 
+
Issues:
+
#Syskeyia has a tendency to vandalize articles of other players with references to RL and silly comments. Evidence about this is presented [http://ns.goobergunch.net/wiki/index.php/NSwiki:Arbitration/Syskeyia#Evidence_by_the_plaintiffs here]. Since Syskeyia has apparently not responded to previous warnings, I urge that something be done to remedy the situation.
+
#The second issue of this arbitration revolves around interpretations of Catholic doctrine in the roleplay of NS nations [[Tanah Burung]] and [[Holy Vatican See]], as compared to the Catholic doctrine espoused by the real-world Holy See.  The article in question is the Nation page of Tanah Burung, which has presented a history of its nation and religion, in this case referring to a roleplay between the two. The dispute arises from edits made by  [[User:Syskeyia|Syskeyia]] to bring the page content into accord with the real-world Catholic Church. The NS Catholic church is fundamentally different and it cannot be said that the "traditional" view on gay marriage is HIS view. I have proposed to change this to an objection by 'some' parts of the church.
+
--[[User:Knootoss| |Knoot]]|[[User talk:Knootoss|KNOO<small>talk</small>]] 22:02, 22 Oct 2004 (GMT) 
+
  
Again, evidence here: 
+
== Cases in arbitration ==
[http://ns.goobergunch.net/wiki/index.php/NSwiki:Arbitration/Syskeyia#Evidence_by_the_plaintiffsEvidence by the plaintiffs]   
+
  
==== Statement by affected party ====
+
* [[NSwiki:Arbitration/FREE-ARMSDONIA]]
  
==== Comments by administrators====
+
== Decided cases ==
 +
* [[NSwiki:Arbitration/Syskeyia|User:Knootoss v. User:Syskeyia]] - '''Accepted''' for Arbitration on 23 October 2004 with two votes and one recusal.  '''Decided''' on 26 October 2004 to place User:Syskeyia on indefinite probation.
  
== Previous issues ==
+
[[Category:NS MetaWiki|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 +
[[Category:Dispute resolution|{{PAGENAME}}]]

Latest revision as of 15:55, 10 October 2007

Community Portal


This page exists only to discuss and resolve issues, like "edit wars" and serious disagreements about content. Try to resolve the conflict using the specific page's discussion/talk page. If, and only if, all other steps have failed, and you see no reasonable chance that the matter can be resolved in another manner, you may request that it be decided by the administrators here.

If you support a particular position, list your username and reasoning.

Please sign all edits to this page with your username and time of posting by typing ~~~~.

Format and Instructions

Use the following format to add an issue:

Case

Users involved in dispute:
Evidence and comments in this case should be directed to NSwiki:Arbitration/CASENAME

Statement of complaint (signed by plantiff(s))

Statement by affected party (signed by respondant(s))

Comments bv administrators (0/0/0/0)

The numbers in the Comments and votes by Arbitrators (0/0/0/0) section corresponds to Accept/Reject/Recuse/Other.


If an administrator decides to protect a page in question, he/she will add:

Page protected by <Administrator's Name> at

Unprotection of that page will be indicated by:

Page unprotected by <Administrator's Name> at <Time of Unprotection>

Keep the list of protections/unprotections in anti-chronological order, with most-recent on top.

Once the issue is resolved, indicate the following in addition to the above:

Description of Resolution:

Requests for Arbitration

Cases in arbitration

Decided cases

  • User:Knootoss v. User:Syskeyia - Accepted for Arbitration on 23 October 2004 with two votes and one recusal. Decided on 26 October 2004 to place User:Syskeyia on indefinite probation.