Difference between revisions of "NSWiki:Deletion"
m (→Tech Level articles (add to this discussion)) |
m (→Januari 7: sp, spacing) |
||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
{{Talk:Quadrocycle}} | {{Talk:Quadrocycle}} | ||
| − | == | + | == January 7 == |
| − | === [[ Ego Effect]] [[Talk:Ego Effect|(add to this discussion)]]=== | + | === [[Ego Effect]] [[Talk:Ego Effect|(add to this discussion)]] === |
| − | Not really an understandable article. Purpose unclear and relation to NS absent. | + | |
| + | Not really an understandable article. Purpose unclear and relation to NS absent. | ||
| + | |||
{{Talk:Ego Effect}} | {{Talk:Ego Effect}} | ||
| − | === [[Tech Level]] articles [[Talk:Tech level|(add to this discussion)]]=== | + | |
| − | Asking for the following to be turned into redirects: | + | === [[Tech Level]] articles [[Talk:Tech level|(add to this discussion)]] === |
| − | *[[Past Tech]] | + | |
| − | *[[Modern Tech]] | + | Asking for the following to be turned into redirects: |
| − | *[[Postmodern Tech]] | + | *[[Past Tech]] |
| − | *[[Future Tech]] | + | *[[Modern Tech]] |
| + | *[[Postmodern Tech]] | ||
| + | *[[Future Tech]] | ||
*[[Fantasy Tech]] | *[[Fantasy Tech]] | ||
| + | |||
{{Talk:Tech level}} | {{Talk:Tech level}} | ||
Revision as of 21:28, 6 January 2005
These pages are candidates for deletion by consensus. Please discuss each article on the appropriate article talk page - only edit this page to add or remove deletion candidates.
- (See NSwiki:Deletion policy for other types of deletion, including Speedy Deletion critria)
To request that an article be deleted, please put an {{inclusion}} tag at the top of the article, post your reason for deletion on the article's talk page, and put the following under the current date:
=== PageToBeDeleted [[Talk:PageToBeDeleted|(add to this discussion)]]===
{{Talk:PageToBeDeleted}}
(where PageToBeDeleted is the name of the page you wish to delete)
December 20
HotRodia II (add to this discussion)
"You don't need a separate page for each puppet nation either, unless it has a roleplaying history of its own." from: NSwiki:Avoiding_common_mistakes. Does this have its own RP history? I'm not sure, but maybe someone else does. Rechze • (talk) 06:58, 20 Dec 2004 (GMT)
It will have a roleplay history of its own...when I get around to writing it. HotRodia 08:17, 2 October 2005 (GMT)
HotRodia III (add to this discussion)
Likewise as talk:HotRodia II:
"You don't need a separate page for each puppet nation either, unless it has a roleplaying history of its own." from: NSwiki:Avoiding_common_mistakes. Does this have its own RP history? I'm not sure, but maybe someone else does. Rechze • (talk) 06:59, 20 Dec 2004 (GMT)
- inclusion tag removed due to lack of consensus ... (except nobody ever added an inclusion tag) → Fris Θtalk 21:33, 19 Jan 2005 (GMT)
See my comment in the HotRodia II talk page. I will write articles for these nations. All of them that I've created pages for, which is a sight fewer than I have on NS. HotRodia 08:20, 2 October 2005 (GMT)
The_USSR (add to this discussion)
See Talk:The Lefts Nirvana for inclusion discussion. (Don't change this to a REDIRECT, please, as this is still a living region of sorts). → Fris Θtalk 15:38, 12 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Vostokoslavia (add to this discussion)
Too short right now. Needs to be infoboxed at the MINIMUM IMO -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 22:38, 26 Nov 2004 (GMT)
General_Tommy_Franks (add to this discussion)
This entry is incomplete. The offensive posts also appeared on the RMBs of the DEN & the New Age Soldiers.
- Not a reason to delete, plus you didn't sign your name here, as you should on a deletion question. Keep and expand (I'll expand myself if I have time). --Goobergunch|? 15:03, 20 Dec 2004 (GMT)
I am curious why there is contention about this post. General Tommy Franks was deleted for racist comments and threats made on the RMB of The Old Raiding Club, and some of the threats came from his puppet The New DEN, and this puppet was also deleted. It is the truth of the matter, and since it is the truth I see no reason for it to be deleted.
I too fail to see the reason for contention. It certanly sounds like what I remember was the case. It even seems neutral in tone. It is a factual recount as I know. - T.R. Kom ( Nat. Acc. : Komokom )
Also, I've just updated the entry to define the comments made by the account which caused it to be struck off. The official entry is something like " Abusive posts and threatening to turn in posters to the Department of Homeland Security. ". This United State 09:15, 7 October 2005 (GMT)
December 29
Atlantic Islands (add to this discussion)
(the following nations no longer exist. Discuss particulars below:)
- Dual Merve, Forestdom 2, Gorodok, Govda, HP-Sauce, Jordan Smith, Killawa, PieHead, Poscom, Quintessential Sunsets, Rodenia, Sejseville, The Commonwealth of Ogakor, The Starry Archipelago, Veegeeville, Vrielle, Warovia
January 2
Social welfare (add to this discussion)
Republic (add to this discussion)
January 5
Quadrocycle (add to this discussion)
- Recommend that this short article be merged into Hall of Ex-Nations and then deleted. → Fris Θtalk 23:05, 5 Jan 2005 (GMT)
- I concur. Rechze • (talk) 00:00, 11 Jan 2005 (GMT)
- Summarised. Antiquated. Concurred. IdioC- エドの狂いtalk 19:26, 12 Jan 2005 (GMT)
January 7
Ego Effect (add to this discussion)
Not really an understandable article. Purpose unclear and relation to NS absent.
Tech Level articles (add to this discussion)
Asking for the following to be turned into redirects:
Inclusion vote on linked articles I am motioning for the aricles Past Tech, Modern Tech, Postmodern Tech, Future Tech and Fantasy Tech to be turned into redirects to Tech Level until something more comprehensive is written for these individual entries.
I have upgraded the summaries for these articles and they are currently superior to the 'main articles' which sometimes fail to define the subject at hand or take into account the specific nationstates of tech mingling on nationstates. Just c/ping my new things onto the 'main articles' would just take up additional server space and create nothing new for readers while changes would also have to be 'doubled up'. Redirects would therefore be more efficient for now. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 16:58, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT)
- Redirects don't have to be placed on the Deletion page. Just redirect them. --Goobergunch|? 00:16, 7 Jan 2005 (GMT)
- After six months, wouldn't it be better to remove the other pages? It's quite a pain in the neck to click a link, wait a minute, and find yourself back where you began. Removing the other, unused pages, and the link to them, would be better, IMO. This also applies the the other techs that Nanakaland mentions below. Trokenyan 01:36, 9 Jun 2005 (GMT)
- I think it's better to write complete articles for each Tech level now. However, this page seems to be usefull for that though. Smertios 13:45, 17 Nov 2005 (GMT -3)
- After six months, wouldn't it be better to remove the other pages? It's quite a pain in the neck to click a link, wait a minute, and find yourself back where you began. Removing the other, unused pages, and the link to them, would be better, IMO. This also applies the the other techs that Nanakaland mentions below. Trokenyan 01:36, 9 Jun 2005 (GMT)
Misc changes but you should probably choose a Tech Level and stick with it (or progress naturally).
Amongst numberous changes I have removed this piece of advice entirely as it is perfectly possible to RP with more then one tech level. Thus it is an unwarranted piece of advice, IMO. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 15:44, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT)
Your nation should check OOC with any potential enemies before committing to roleplay in Future Tech.
Likewise, this is silly advice as future tech nations RP with other future tech nations and in no way is checking needed. Nor is it always relevant to RP. Removed. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 15:57, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT)
Some tech levels have been added. A lot actually. Just checking to make sure we didn't go too bold... - Nanakaland 03:12, 9 Mar 2005 (GMT)
