These pages are candidates for deletion by consensus. Please discuss each article on the appropriate article talk page - only edit this page to add or remove deletion candidates.

See NSwiki:Deletion policy for other types of deletion, including speedy deletion criteria.

To request that an article be deleted, please put an {{inclusion}} tag at the top of the article, post your reason for deletion on the article's talk page, and put the following under the current date (if the current date is not listed, post it below other dates):

=== [[PageToBeDeleted]] ([[Talk:PageToBeDeleted|add to this discussion]]) ===
{{Talk:PageToBeDeleted}}

where PageToBeDeleted is the name of the page you wish to delete. If the article is not posted to this page, the sysops may not see it and the article will not get deleted!

20 September 2005

Ancient Iberian, Iberialustinia, and Porto (add to this discussion)

Deletion discussion

This discussion is now closed. The article was deleted by 24 December 2005 on {{{2}}}, with consensus to delete achieved. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. --Goobergunch|? 03:30, 24 December 2005 (GMT)

This Nation Stub deals with a nation that longer exists, apparently it left no legacy and wasn't updated ever since January. I believe this page has no use.

Greetings, Sozy

Procedural nomination. --Goobergunch|? 19:17, 20 September 2005 (GMT)

Concur with deletion.Gruen2alk 05:01, 13 November 2005 (GMT)

Looks like a pretty standard deletion candidate to me. I concur with the deletion. ~ Ceorant (or rave) 23:19, November 17, 2005 (GMT)

Plunder Island (add to this discussion)

Deletion discussion

This discussion is now closed. The article was deleted by 24 December 2005 on {{{2}}}, with consensus to delete achieved. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. --Goobergunch|? 03:33, 24 December 2005 (GMT)

This is a procedural nomination. An inclusion tag was placed on this article on 27 July 2005 by 83.114.176.7. For the love of Max, people, please put the articles you nominate for deletion on NSwiki:Deletion so we can keep track of them. --Goobergunch|? 19:42, 20 September 2005 (GMT)

Concur with deletion.Gruen2alk 05:02, 13 November 2005 (GMT)

I concur. ~ Ceorant (or rave) 23:25, November 17, 2005 (GMT)

11 November 2005

AS-59 Space Launch Assist Aircraft (add to this discussion)

Will you actually be filling in all these empty articles of yours soon, ZMI? Just a suggestion rather than criticism, but maybe you should have left them as red links in an actual article until you had something to put in them. - Aridd, 4 November 2005.

Procedural nomination. --Goobergunch|? 21:27, 11 November 2005 (GMT)

I agree with Aridd, except for the whole "failure to add the article to NSwiki:Deletion" thing. Delete unless expanded. --Goobergunch|? 21:27, 11 November 2005 (GMT)

Logged from #nswiki:

<Gruenberg> oh, Doc, one of your blank articles has been tagged {{inclusion}}.

<Gruenberg> http://ns.goobergunch.net/wiki/index.php/Talk:AS-59_Space_Launch_Assist_Aircraft

<Doc_Evilonavich> whut?

<Doc_Evilonavich> what manner of madness is this

<Doc_Evilonavich> ah

<Doc_Evilonavich> yes they will be

<Doc_Evilonavich> all of them

<Doc_Evilonavich> I just got back from hospital after doing a tomatoe man from a wasp sting

<Gruenberg> oh, ok.

<Doc_Evilonavich> so if you wouldnt mind going for the throat right away

<Doc_Evilonavich> but yes I will be adding to it

<Gruenberg> right.

<Doc_Evilonavich> it may take me a while but I have every intention of doing every last one of them

<Doc_Evilonavich> I do have at the very least images for all of them

However, I would urge that they be filled in quickly, and until they are, I support the deletion.Gruen2alk 22:33, 11 November 2005 (GMT)

Yah am slow at getting through these and if you feel it neccesary and would clear up the wiki feel free to delete them, its just eventually I will have to recreate them. Doc.

Deleted. Gruen2alk 09:23, 9 January 2006 (GMT)

Apex League Results (add to this discussion)

Deletion discussion

This discussion is now closed. The article was deleted by 24 December 2005 on {{{2}}}, with consensus to delete achieved. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. --Goobergunch|? 03:34, 24 December 2005 (GMT)

Procedural nomination. --Goobergunch|? 21:44, 11 November 2005 (GMT)

Concur with deletion.Gruen2alk 05:03, 13 November 2005 (GMT)

Go on then

Neutral zone (add to this discussion)

Deletion discussion

This discussion is now closed. The article was deleted by 24 December 2005 on {{{2}}}, with consensus to delete achieved. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. --Goobergunch|?

I do not believe this subject merits a seperate article. It has no real content, no content, no links to it at all, just a "coming soon" marker. If it remains like this I move that it be deleted. Also because the name is so general, there are a lot of other neutral zones no doubt· --|Knoot|KNOOtalk 14:18, 2 October 2005 (GMT)

Procedural nomination. And Knoot, you should know to list things on NSwiki:Deletion. --Goobergunch|? 21:48, 11 November 2005 (GMT)

Delete. And sorry Goob. Forgot about that in this case it would seem. --|Knoot|KNOOtalk 22:05, 11 November 2005 (GMT)

Concur with deletion.Gruen2alk 05:03, 13 November 2005 (GMT)

Sasquatch Territory (Talk:Sasquatch Territory)

Deletion discussion

This discussion is now closed. The article was deleted by 24 December 2005 on {{{2}}}, with consensus to delete achieved. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. --Goobergunch|?

I recommend the deletion of this article due to the region no longer existing. The only reason I could see for its inclusion is in reference to the invasion of Pink Floyd, which is documented on appropriate pages. Ceorana|ΦΔ 02:01, 19 October 2005 (GMT)

Procedural nomination. --Goobergunch|? 21:52, 11 November 2005 (GMT)

Concur with deletion.Gruen2alk 05:04, 13 November 2005 (GMT)

Thirded'd. Woo, I made up a new word. IdioC- エドtalk 01:09, 16 November 2005 (GMT)

13 November 2005

Jambuula (add to this discussion)

This stub appears of little value, given that the EPTO page states everything contained in it. As this is an ex-nation, I see little value in keeping it. However, some members may feel this nation has 'historic' status, and in the light of a comment on the EPTO regarding 'the Jambuuland hostage incident' or some such, it may be possible to add to this article. However, in its present state, I do not see any point retaining it.Gruen2alk 03:41, 13 November 2005 (GMT)

• I vote redirect to East Pacific Treaty Organization. --Goobergunch|? 03:38, 24 December 2005 (GMT)

• Wouldn't that get confusing? If someone was searching for Jambuula, and they got a redirect to a region page, that wouldn't be good, especially if they were a new user. Of course, we could add a little disclaimer to the region page, but that still could get confusing. I vote delete. → Ceo\squawk 06:21, December 24, 2005 (GMT)

Redirected. Gruen2alk 09:22, 9 January 2006 (GMT)

14 November 2005

Official names of the USTsR (add to this discussion)

Ok, I do not see the point in this. A whole page, full of dead links, just on names for a NATION STUB in languages which haven't been given Wiki articles yet? No, this strikes me as a monumental waste of space. I've added it to USTsR for the time being. Looks ugly, I know, but there is no content in that article. To waste a whole other page seems...bizarre.Gruen2alk 01:23, 14 November 2005 (GMT)

• Concur, delete. --Goobergunch|? 03:38, 24 December 2005 (GMT)

Deleted, and noted on Talk:USTsR. Gruen2alk 09:25, 9 January 2006 (GMT)

Commitment of improvement

I've decided to recreate this page now that I've finally got round to expanding the page it originally serves. I fully appreciate the reason for its original deletion, and can only apologise and regret that I didn't sort this out earlier.

This page was originally created to mimic a similar page on the Wikipedia site - the article on the Soviet Union had a "Official names of the Soviet Union" page in exactly the same fashion. But now I think - and I agree, only now, that the same thing is worth its space here. This was the first thing I did for the USTsR page originally - and then I got caught up in other things and never got round to finishing it - until now. Bare with me, you'll see those red links disappear! But I think you'll agree, the information here doesn't quite fit in properly with what is now on the USTsR.

If you disagree, please contact me, and I'll try and sort something out. --ZedderZulu 14:15, 21 January 2006 (GMT)

TechWiki (add to this discussion)

Unless there's a bigger explanation about this Wiki planned for this article, it seems too much like an advertisement to be included on NSwiki. Plus, the editor of this page is only editing through an IP username, which means we can't communicate with you in order to see what exactly these plans are - hopefully you do post here, though. If you can help us by elaborating this article a little bit more, I'll remove the inclusion and stub tags. --Pacitalkia 22:41, 14 November 2005 (GMT)

Since no pages link to this one, it doesn't really seem like it belongs here. ~ Ceorant (or rave) 23:22, November 17, 2005 (GMT)

Although I didn't write this article I can expand upon it if you would like. (Unsigned comment by User:Macabees → Ceo\squawk 04:46, December 2, 2005 (GMT))

The person who wrote it is the player of Space Union. Maybe a TG to him would be in order? → Ceo\squawk 04:46, December 2, 2005 (GMT)

If his last edit was within the last 60 days, message him on his userpage. If not, TG him through NS. He still is active (we're in an alliance together). --Pacitalkia 05:15, 2 December 2005 (GMT)

The TechWiki appears dead. I'm deleting this. Gruen2alk 09:26, 9 January 2006 (GMT)

The TechWiki itself doesn't seem that active. If it dies a death, then this article would cease to serve a point. Perhaps we should see what happens with that? Gruen2alk 11:36, 2 December 2005 (GMT)

In all actuality I'm the administration and webmaster to TechWiki and so I would be best to finish this article since I know what I'm talking about when it comes to what TechWiki stands for. Regardless, the issue of inactivity has some grounds, but then again, I haven't been trying my hardest to get it active since I really don't know much about Wiki and am still learning. Nonetheless, it's really up to the NSWiki sysops. Macabees 17:12, 6 December 2005 (GMT)

{{inclusion}} debates are for all NSwiki community members, not just sysops. The point is: if TechWiki is going to be active, and if the article on NSwiki is filled out accordingly, I could see a point to the article remaining. Afterall, we have an article on NSTracker. But if the TechWiki isn't going to be active, then the article won't serve much point. In short, I'd advocate waiting. There's no immediate dash to remove the article. I vote keep, but also keep this debate open, and assess things a little later. Gruen2alk 19:00, 6 December 2005 (GMT)

15 November 2005

The Act of Union of the United Kingdom of Egypt and Sudan add to this discussion

Blanked by an IP that looks similar to the starter's. I have reverted to Fris's edit, but I really see no value in keeping it if the contributor doesn't want it. I am just unwary about deleting such a substantial page without consensus. Gruen2alk 22:53, 15 November 2005 (GMT)

Samson Incorporated (add to this discussion)

Deletion discussion

This discussion is now closed. The inclusion tag was removed by 9 January 2005 on ~~~~~, as there was consensus to keep the article. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. Please start a new section to discuss the article. --Goobergunch|? 20:11, 9 January 2006 (GMT)

Not sure if this is a speedy or not. The page had no content except for a category, and now an inclusion tag. ~ Ceorant (or rave) 22:18, November 16, 2005 (GMT)

This is another TBC from Doc Evilonavich. Again, unless it is filled in soon, I see no reason to keep it around as a placeholder.Gruen2alk 10:09, 17 November 2005 (GMT)

Since content has been added, I think this discussion is irrelevant. Doc Evilonavich has also removed the inclusion tag. → Ceo \ squawk 19:11, 27 December 2005 (GMT)