Difference between revisions of "NSWiki:Admin nominations"

Revision as of 22:42, 10 October 2004

See existing administrators.

To view previous nomination votes, see NSwiki:New admins.

Please use wikipedia:Requests for adminship as a guide for nominating and formatting.

Most importantly, an admin should have thorough knowledge of NSwiki and should visit meta pages often. It is preferred if the admin has had a large amount of edits (In the top 20% of editors), and contributes on a relatively regular basis.

As the Wikipedia guide linked to above indicates, only users who are registered and logged in can vote and/or be nominated.

If you don't know whether to nominate a user as a sysop or as a bureaucrat, go with "sysop" by default. If a user has been doing well as a sysop, then nominate him/her as a "bureaucrat."

Nominations for sysopship

Note: Nominations have to be accepted by the user in question. If you nominate a user, please also leave a message on their talk page and ask them to reply here if they accept the nomination.

Current time is 10:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Knootoss (10/4/0)

Granted provisionally by Goobergunch|? 20:17, 7 Oct 2004 (GMT)

I'd recommend Knootoss --Frisbeeteria 01:55, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Heh. Thanks ^_^;;;; - Knoot 08:44, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Support

1. I support. He's active and a good contributor. Crimmer 12:42, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
2. Knoot accepts the nomination.
3. What Crimmer said, very active and very helpful edits. Also very helpful on IRC. --Goobergunchia 16:34, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
4. Meh. My vote belongs in the tally for Knoot. --Frisbeeteria 18:04, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
5. Def votes for. --Defaultia 23:34, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
6. Diablo_NL votes for Knootoss. He has so far done a great job. And if he screws it up I can always go by and punish him. ;) Diablo NL

   Edits by User:82.156.36.49 count towards validity of User:Diablo_NL's vote. --Goobergunch|? 23:23, 10 Oct 2004 (GMT)

7. I support Knootoss. If the CACE clique is so worried about his free-market bias, why don't they nominate one of their own, like Xiukang, for sysop? Syskeyia 6:39, 10 Oct 2004 (Central Time)
8. Go Knootoss!. Iuthia 00:30, 11 Oct 2004 (GMT)
9. K-stan says "yea" to Knoot, even if he is Dutch.  :) K-stan 7:53, 10 Oct 2004 (EST)
10. The Serene^Union gives a thumbs up to Knootoss. Kaenei

    Only other edit by this user is on NSwiki:Logo candidates - however, it takes a good deal of time and effort to make a logo. --Goobergunch|? 00:06, 11 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Oppose

1. I am against; K is not neutral and incapable of being neutral. --Pudding
2. As much as I am a friend of this individual, I would think it may be wiser to find a less controversial player who's made it a point never to cross anyone on purpose. --Galdago

   Only edits by this user are on this page and the userpage. --Goobergunch|? 22:06, 10 Oct 2004 (GMT) (Because he's got it all in a word document and is trying to format it to NSWiki... oi confusion.)

3. This would alienate a great many people from NSwiki. No. Rehochipe

   Apart from a few political enemies (who I've yet to see as active NSwiki contributors), who exactly would this alienate? That's an awfully large position stated in awfully few words. - Frisbeeteria 22:54, 10 Oct 2004 (GMT)

4. I can see, actually, whom this would alienate and discourage from becoming productive contributors to the NS Wiki project. Nothing personal, but Knootoss is a nation that not many would consider seperable from nation-based biases. I find I must vote no.TJHairball

Neutral

Comments/Questions

Knoot: Well, I'm not sure how to count the votes here (I'd say Frisbeeteria counts as 'pro' too. The lesson of Florida: when in doubt, count the votes in your favour ;) Anyway I'll just wait untill people come and complain about my inherent bias and incompetence.

Meh. I don't count the nomination as a vote, but I'm for letting Frisbeeteria vote - when I nominated Defaultia, I immediately voted "1. Goobergunchia As in nomination". --Goobergunchia 16:34, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)

You are too kind ^_^ *is a happy elf] now*

Since it seems particularly pointless to wait a proper seven days, I'm granting Knoot provisional sysop status now - however, the vote will remain open for the full seven-day period and this status can be revoked if there's a shift in the voting margin. --Goobergunch|? 20:17, 7 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Frisbeeteria (6/0/1)

Frisbeeteria has been one of the most helpful members of NSwiki, having re-categorized, infoboxed, and just been really darn good at getting articles spiffy in the trifecta of the main, NSwiki, and Category namespaces. --Goobergunch|? 23:49, 10 Oct 2004 (GMT)

I accept nomination gratefully, thanks. -- Frisbeeteria 23:51, 10 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Support

1. As in nomination --Goobergunch|? 23:49, 10 Oct 2004 (GMT)
2. Despite the fact that he killed my dreams of an omniscient weapons database... I vote for Fris. He knows his way around, and he didn't go postal over me putting up 20 pages an hour.  :) K-stan 23:59, 10 October 2004 (UTC)
3. Goobergunch reminds me that it is legal to vote for oneself. - Frisbeeteria 00:03, 11 Oct 2004 (GMT)
4. I think he would make an excellent Sysop. Great contributions. Active, intelligent and cool-headed. Thumbs up. Only makes sense. Knoot 00:09, 11 Oct 2004 (GMT)
5. Has my support Vrak 00:23, 11 Oct 2004 (GMT)
6. Agreed. -- Crimmer 02:42, 11 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Oppose

Neutral

1. I have no objections to Frisbee at this point in time. TJHairball

Comments/Questions

• Just a request - could people please remember to update the vote tally when they vote? Thanks. --Goobergunch|? 00:12, 11 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Nominations for bureaucratship